FACTORS INFLUENCING COMPLIANCE TO DIETARY REGIMEN AMONG DIABETIC PATIENT IN LADOKE AKINTOLA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY TEACHING HOSPITAL OSOGBO. BY FOLARANMI BASIRAT TEMITOPE
FACTORS INFLUENCING
COMPLIANCE TO DIETARY REGIMEN AMONG DIABETIC PATIENT IN LADOKE AKINTOLA
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
TEACHING HOSPITAL OSOGBO.
BY
FOLARANMI BASIRAT
TEMITOPE
MATRIC NO: 082061
A RESEARCH SUBMITTED TO
THE DEPARTMENT OF NURSING, COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES, LADOKE AKINTOLA
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY,
OSOGBO.
IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF
THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF BACHELOR OF NURSING SCIENCE
(BNSC)
JANUARY, 2013.
CERTIFICATION
This
is to certify that Folaranmi Basirat Temitope, Matric No……..……carried out this
research under my supervisor.
B.L.
AJIBADE _______________
(Rn,
Ph,D, FWAN) Signature &
Date
Supervisor
FOLARANMI BASIRAT
TEMITOPE ________________
Student Signature &
Date
Dr. W.A. TIJANI
RN, RPHN, BNSC, MSc,
PhD, FWAC ____________________
HEAD OF DEPARTMENT Signature & Date
DEDICATION
This study is dedicated to Almighty
Allah and my beloved parent for their continual love and encouragement towards
the success of this research. I wish you long life and prosperity (AMIN).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I
give all glory and adoration to Almighty Allah, the lord of the world, the long
of the day of judgement, the most beneficent, the most merciful, for His guide
and tutelage, over me throughout my training in Nursing Department, Ladoke
Akintola University of Technology, Osogbo.
My
unreserved thanks goes to my able, competent, enthusiastic, dynamic and
indefatigable supervisor, or B.L. Ajibade for devoting his precious time to
read and make necessary corrections before the final draft may God Almighty be
with you in all your daily endeavours.
I
would like to commend the effort of my parents, late Chief Mr. Folaranmi and
Mrs. Folaranmi A.M for their parental support in making my dreams comes through.
May you live long (matter) to reap the fruit of your labour in peace and good
health.
Also,
I equally extend my special thanks to the head of the department Dr. W.A.
Tijani and other lecturers in the department for their unflinching support
during the court of my study.
My
profound gratitude goes to my loving, caring and understanding husband Mr
Omolola Adams Olatayo, for his support financially, spiritually and morally, may
God Almight continue to bless our union. My sincere apprication also go to my siblings,
friends, loved one and colleagues most importantly Shittu Adebowale for their
moral support and encouragement.
Conclusively,
I also appreciate my respondents for taking time, to fill my questionnaire, God
bless you all.
Folaranmi
B.T.
ABSTRACT
This research work examined the
factors influencing Compliance to dietary regimen diabetes patient in Lautech
Teaching Hospital Osogbo. The study was carried out using descriptive design. A
self designed questionnaire having three number of section, section A is the
demographic Data containing seven items, section B is the knowledge on Diabetes
and perception of dietary regimen containing Twenty-three items and section
family support which contains six items, was administered to one hundred and
nine (109) respondents that was chosen using purposive sampling technique. The
finding shows that gender and type of management were not significantly
associated with level of compliance to dietary regimen. Similarly it also
revealed that educational status, family support and socio-economics status
were significant to compliance to dietary regimen among, diabetes mellitus
patient.
Sequel to the findings of this
research, It was concluded that all efforts should be made to address factors
like level of education, family support and socio-economic status etc, that
influence the level of compliance of respondents toward there dietary the level
of compliance of respondents toward there dietary regimen.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FRONT
PAGE i
CERTIFICATION ii
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
ABSTRACT v
TABLE
OF CONTENT vi-ix
LIST
OF TABLES
LIST
OF FIGURES
CHAPTER ONE:
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY 1-2
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM 3
1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY 3
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF PROBLEM 3-4
1.5 SCOPE OR DELIMITATION OF THE STUDY 4
1.6 DEFINITION OF TERMS 4-5
CHAPTER TWO:
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 INTRODUCTION 6
2.2 CONCEPTUAL
LITERATURE REVIEW 6-27
2.2.1 THE MEANING OF DIABETES MELLITUS 6-7
2.2.2 CAUSES OF DIABETES MELLITUS 7
2.2.3 PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
OF DIABETES MELLITUS 7-9
2.2.4 SIGNS
AND SYMPTOMS OF DIABETES MELLITUS 9-10
2.2.5 DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES MELLITUS 10-12
2.2.6 CLASSIFICATION OF DIABETES MELLITUS 13-14
2.2.7 TREATMENT OF D.M 4-19
2.2.8 DIETARY MANAGEMENT OF D.M. 19-22
2.2.9 NUTRITIONAL CARE 22-24
2.2.10 COMPLICATIONS OF D.M 24-27
2.3 EMPERICAL LITERATURE REVIEW 27-36
2.3.1 EMPERICAL
STUDIES COMPLIANCE BEHAVIOR 27
2.3.2 NON COMPLIANCE TO DIET REGIMEN 27-28
2.3.3 FACTOR WHICH AFFECT COMPLIANCE TO DIET 29-30
2.3.4 INFORMATION
NEEDED TO MAZIMIZE COMPLIANCE 30-31
2.3.5 FACTOR
CONTRIBUTING TO PATIENT NOT
COMPLYING TO EATING AND DRINKING
IN HOSPITAL 31-35
2.3.6 FACTORS INFLUENCING COMPLIANCE
TO DIETARY REGIMEN 35-36
2.4 CONCEPTUAL MODEL 37-41
2.5 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 41
2.6 RESEARCH QUESTIONS 42
2.7 RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS 42
CHAPTER THREE:
3.0 RESEARCH METHOLOGY
3.1 INTRODUCTION 43
3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN 43
3.3 RESEARCH SETTING 43
3.4 TARGET POPULATION 43-44
3.5 SAMPLE AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUE 44
3.6 PILOT STUDY 44-45
3.7 VALIDITY
AND RELIABILITY OF THE INSTRUMENT 45
3.8 INSTRUMENT FOR DATA COLLECTION
45
3.9 TYPE OF DATA COLLECTION 45
3.10 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY 46
3.11 ETHICAL CONSIDERATION 46
3.12 ADMINISTRATION OF QUESTIONNAIRE 46
CHAPTER FOUR:
4.0 PRESENTATION OF RESULT
4.1 INTRODUCTION 47
4.2 PRESENTATION OF DATA IN TABULAR FORM 48-49
4.3 PRESENTATION OF DATA IN FIGURE 50-55
4.4 ANSWERING OF RESEARCH QUESTION
56
4.5 TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS 57-62
CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS, SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATION
5.0 INTRODUCTION 63
5.1 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS 63-66
5.2 IMPLICATION FOR NURSES 66-68
5.3 SUMMARY 68-69
5.4 CONCLUSION 69-70
5.5 RECOMMENDATION 70
REFERENCES 68
Appendixes
Apendix i: Appendix
for analysis of data
Appendix ii: Letter
of permission to collect data/information
Appendix iii: Questionnaire.
Table 2.1: Showing type of insulin
Table 2.2: Showing some common sources of dietary fibres
Table 2.3: Showing selected sample meals for exchange
lists
Table 2.5: Conceptual framework
Table 4.10: Showing demographic characteristic of the
respondents.
Fig. 4-10 - 4.19 Showing knowledge on D.M & perception
towards Dietary Regimen 50 - 55
Fig. 4.10: What is diabetes mellitus?
50
Fig. 4.11: If it can be treated through which means
can it be treated? 50
Fig. 4.12: Which of the means of treatment are you using? 51
Fig. 4.13: Have you been coping with dietary regimen
given to you in the hospital? 51
Fig. 4.14: How often do you check your weight?
52
Fig. 4.15: Diabetes diet are expensive? 53
Fig. 4.16: Diabetes diet are complex? 53
Fig. 4.17: Diabetes diet causes diarrhea? 54
Fig. 4.18: Management of D.M is a daily discipline? 54
Fig. 4.19: Is any of your family members staying with
them? 55
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
Diabetes
Mellitus (DM) is derived from the Greek word ‘Diabeinnein’ meaning ‘To pass
through’ describing copious urination, and Mellitus from the latin word meaning
‘sweetened with honey’ These two word signify sweetened urine or sugar in
urine. Diabetes mellitus is a group of
metabolic disease characterized by increased levels of glucose in the blood
(hyperglycaemia) resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action or
both (American Diabetes Association (ADA,
2009). Normally, a certain amount of glucose circulate in the blood. The major sources of this glucose are
absorption of ingested food in the gastro-intestinal tract and formation of
glucose by the liver from food substances.
According
to the (world Health Organization (WHO, 2008) DM, is a disease that occurs both
in developed and developing countries. In developing countries like Nigeria DM
affects over 1.5million people and in developed countries life in the United States
more than 23 million people have diabetes mellitus, although about, one third
of these cases are undiagnosed. In
developed Countries, most patients having DM are over Sixty years of age but in
developing Countries, diabetes mellitus is found to affect people in their
prime. The number of people newly diagnosed with DM increases by about 1
million people per year (Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC,
2008).By 2030, the number of cases is expected to exceed 30 million. (Centre for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC, 2008).
In
2000, the world estimate of the prevalence of DM was 171 million people and by
2030, this is expected to increase to more than 360 million. DM is especially prevalent in the elderly, as
many as 50% of people older than 65 years and older account for almost 40% of
people with DM (WHO, 2008).Minority of the populations are disproportionately
affected by DM from 1980 through 2002, the age – adjusted prevalence of DM
increased among all gender and race group but compared to Cavcasian,
African. Americans and members of other
racial and Americans are more likely to develop DM and they are at greater risk
for many of the complications and have higher death rate due to DM (CDC, 2008). MD has far reaching and devastating physical,
social and economic consequences including the following (Smeltzer & Bare
2008).
1. DM
is the leading cause of non traumatic amputations, blindness in working age
adults and end-stage renal disease (CDC 2008).
2. DM is the third leading causes of death
from disease, primarily because of the high rate of cardio vascular disease
(myocardial infection, stroke and peripheral vascular disease among people with
DM)
3. Hospitalization rates for people with DM
are 2.4 times greater for adults and 5.3 greater for children than for the
general population.
The
economic cost of DM continues to increase because of increasing health care
costs and an aging population of half of all people who have DM are older than
65 years of age and are hospitalized each year because of the severe and life
threatening complications which often contribute to the increased rate of
hospitalization.
One can decide to carry out a research
due to hunt having gone through these studies. I have seen that the kind of
management given to diabetes client when been admitted into the hospital, they
still come back to the hospital within a very short of time with one complain
or the other. This prompted me to research the factors influencing the level of
compliance to dietary regimen among diabetes patient in LAUTECH teaching
hospital Osogbo.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
It has been discovered that majority
of D.M patient having being discharged, within a short time they come back to
the hospital either for problem or a complication associated with DM, and it
has been discovered that majority of the D.M patient may either refuse to
comply with the dietary regimen or find it difficult to purchase or cook the
prescribed dietary regimen therefore this research tried to find our factors
influencing level of compliance to dietary regimen.
1.3 OBJECTIVE
OF THE STUDY
The objective of the study is to
1. Identify medical factors that are
associated with compliance to dietary regimen.
2. Examine the factors that are associated
with compliance along the gender variables.
3. Examine the support of significant others
towards compliances with dietary regimen.
4. Identify the factors that are associated
with compliance with dietary regiment through the level of education.
5. Examine the influence of socio-economic
status towards compliance to dietary regimen.
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
1. The result of the research will be
communicated to the LAUTECH Teaching Hospital in order to have a policy on the compliance
of client to dietary regimen at the diabetic clinic.
2. It will reduce the alarming incidence of
complications due to non-compliance to dietary regimen.
3. It will enlighten diabetic client on the
need for compliance to dietary regimen and to improve their attendance at
diabetic clinic.
4. The outcome of the study shall also
contribute to existing knowledge in planning nursing care and health education
programmes for patients with diabetes mellitus.
1.5 SCOPE
OR DELIMITATION OF THE STUDY
This study is delimited to D.M
patients attending out patient clinic and in patient in Ladoke Akintola
University Teaching Hospital, Osogbo, Osun State,
before the respondent was selected he or she will have come to the hospital
twice and was selected during the clinic. This research work will cover diabetic
patients both male and female between the age of twenty year and fifty year
plus, whether they have formal education or not.
1.6 DEFINATION OF TERMS
For the purpose of this study both
operational and conceptional definitions have been adopted.
Compliance:
This means that
willingness to follow a prescribed course of treatment (www.the
free dictionary.com) retrieved 28/12/2012.
Gender: This is a state of being male or
female (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender) retrieved 28/12/2012.
Low-Income
Earners: are those
patients that are earning less than minimum wage of the Country.
Attitude: It can be defined as a positive or
negative evaluation of people, objects, event, activities, ideas, or just about
anything in your environment (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attitude Retrieved
28/12/2012).
Diabetes Mellitus (D.M.) a disturbance
in the oxidation and utilization of glucose, which is secondary to a
malfunction of the beta cells of pancreas, whose function is the production and
release of insulin. (Barbara 2009).
High
Income Earners: According
to this study they are those patients that their salaries are scaled using the
minimum wage of the Country.
Dietary
Regimen: Are the selected types of foods that are
prescribed to help the treatment and management of DM.
Out
Patients: This refers
to clients who come from home to receive health education on the new life
style, nutrient and medical treatment suitable for the improvement of their
diseased condition.
Level
of Education: This is
the individuals’ academic qualification or attainment.
Family
support: This is the assistance render by the family
in terms of money, following the patient to the hospital, given moral support
and even social support.
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE
REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
This part of the research deals with the review of
pertinent literature, towards this end both empirical and conceptual literature
review will be carried out.
2.2 Conceptual Literature Review
2.2.1 The Meaning of D.M.
DM
is a group of metabolic disorder in which the body has a deficiency of and/or a
resistance to insulin (Jerreat 2003). It is the most common endocrine disorder
and is an insidious disease, with the risk of developing it increasing with
age. It is a variable disorder of carbohydrate metabolism caused by a
combination of hereditary and environmental factors and usually characterized
by in adequate secretion or utilization of insulin, by excessive urine
production, by excessive amounts of sugar in the blood and urine and by thirst,
hunger and loss of weight (Merriam-webster, 2011, M-W. Com).
The
term “diabetes mellitus” refers to a group of diseases that affect how the body
uses blood glucose, commonly called blood sugar Glucose, is vital to one’s
health because it’s an important source of energy for the cells that make up
the muscles and tissues. It’s the
brain’s main source of fuel. If one has DM, no matter what type, it means one
have too much glucose in the blood, although the reasons may differ. Too much glucose can lead to serious health
problems.
Chronic
DM conditions include type 1 DM and type 2 DM potentially reversible diabetes
conditions include prediabetes mellitus.
When your blood sugar levels are higher than normal, but not high enough
to be classified as DM and gestational diabetes, which occurs during pregnancy
(http//www. Mayo clinic. Com, retrieved March 30, 2012).
2.2.2 Causes of D.M.
Insulin
plays a very important part in regulating how much glucose is available in
blood for energy and how much is stored away in the liver as glycogen insulin
is an hormone produced by special collection of cells in the pancreas known as
islet of langerhans. The islets of langerhans pour a lot of insulin into the
blood stream after a large quantities of insulin are necessary to store
excessive glucose in the liver (Hortwitz,2002).
2.2.3 Pathophysiology of D.M.
In
DM something goes wrong. The islets of langerhans are damaged, not enough
insulin is produced and instead of excess glucose being stored in the liver, it
simply, accumulates in the blood stream, when the sugar in the blood rises
above certain level of threshold, the kidney-excretes the excess sugar in the
urine. Hence large quantities of urine
are passed to get rid of the excess sugar. The excessive urination soon leads
to thirst, while the continuous drain of glucose from the body depletes the
tissues of their vital energy supplies.
In
persons hereditarily disposed to DM persistent over eating and obesity coming
on in middle age may lead to the on set of DM, which may be precipitated by an
infection, an accident or by pregnancy.
In
children, the exact cause of DM (Juvenile DM) remain unknown realm for medical
scientists. The accurate and definite
cause of the disease is still a mystery, though there is an accepted beliefs on
it that it is due to some risk factors.
Juvenile D.M. is basically a condition in which the body’s defence
system attacks and damages its very own cells called Auto immune response when
such a problem takes place, the vital cells in the pancreas that makes insulin
cease to function resulting in the absence of the hormone (insulin) in the
body. Insulin is a very important part
in the energy processing in our body. It
helps in the proper absorption of the sugar called glucose into the different
cells in our body.
Some
experts have suggested that juvenile DM may be called by heredity. According to scientists, people who have the
genetic tendency to develop coxsackle, rubella and mumps viruses may also
develop juvenile D.M. This is because
such viruses can trigger the onset of the disease (www. What caused diabetes
net reviewed on March 30, 2012).
Some conditions that damage or destroy
the pancreas such as pancreatutis, pancreatic surgery or certain industrial
chemicals can cause D.M.
Certain drugs can also cause temporary
DM including corticosteroids, beta blockers and phenytoin. Rare genetic disorders (Klinefelter syndrome,
Huntington’s
cholera, wolfram syndrome, leprechaunism, Rabson-mendenhall syndrome,
lipoatrophic diabetes and others) and hormonal disorders (acromegally, cushing
syndrome, pheochromocytoma, hyperthyroidism, somatostatinoma, aldostaronoma)
also increase the risk for D.M (Alemzadeh & wyatt 2007).
Carbohydrate foods are the main
supplier of the blood sugar. If one eat
more carbohydrate foods, the blood glucose level will go up, the level of
inflammation in the body will go up too and inflammation is the cause of
disease development including damages to beta cells of the pancreas. When damages of the beta cells happen some of
the beta cells would die, others would try to work as hard they used to. However, the number of healthy beta cells has
decreased and those damaged ones cannot work in their full capacity, thus
damaged ones can not work in their full capacity, thus the production of
insulin has decreased too. Therefore the blood sugar level would stay
increased.
Excessive intake of carbohydrate foods
also leads to gaining of weight (obesity) which predisposes one to D.M. so
eating too much carbohydrate foods, especially those refined, processed foods
including grains, grain products or flour products, starching foods such as
potato, sweet potato and sugary foods and beverages including fruit juice with
added sugars or high fructose corn syrup, sugars, cola are associated with the risk
of obesity. D.M. and other disease
including cancers. (Robert 2011, www carbohydrate can kill. Com. Reviewed March
30, 2012).
2.2.4 Signs and Symptoms of Diabetes Mellitus
The
early symptoms of untreated diabetes are related to elevated blood sugar levels
and loss of glucose in the urine can cause increase urine out put and lead to
dehydration. Dehydration causes
increased thirst and water consumption.
The
inability of insulin to perform normally has effects on protein, fat and
carbohydrate metabolism. Insulin is an
anabolic hormone, i.e, one that encourages, storage of fat and protein. A
relative or absolute insulin deficiency eventually leads to weight loss despite
an increase in appetite. Some untreated diabetes mellitus patients also
complain of fatigue, nausea and vomiting patient with D.M. are prone to
developing infections of the bladder, skin and vaginal areas. Fluctuations in blood glucose levels can lead
to blurred vision to lethargy and coma.
When
the blood sugar level rises above 160 to 180mgld glucose passes into the urine
when the level rises even higher, the kidneys excrete additional water to
dilute the large amounts of glucose lost.
Because the kidneys produce excessive urine a person with D.M. urinates
large volumes frequently (polyuria). The excessive urination creates abnormal
thirst (polydipsia). Because excessive
calories are lost in the urine, the person loses weight, to compensate. The
person often feels excessively hungry (polyphagia) other symptoms include
drowsiness, decreased endurance during exercise.
In
people with type 1 D.M. the symptoms begin abruptly and may progress rapidly to
a condition called diabetic keto acidosis.
Despite high levels of sugar in the blood, most cells can’t use sugar
without insulin thus, they turn to other sources of energy far cells begin to
break down, producing ketones, tonic chemical compounds that can make the blood
acidic (keto acidosis). The initial symptoms of diabetic keto acidosis include
excessive thirst and urination, weight loss nausea, vomiting, fatigue and
particularly in children abdominal pain.
Breathing tends to become deep and rapid as the body attempts to correct
the blood’s acidity. The person’s breath smells like nail polish remover,
without treatment, diabetic keto acidosis can progress to come, sometimes
within a few hours.
People
with type II D.M. may not have any symptoms for years is or decades, when
insulin deficiency progresses, symptoms may develop, keto acidosis is
rare. If the blood sugar level becomes
very high (often exceeding 1,00mg/dl) - usually as the result of some super
imposed stress such as an infection or drug the person may develop severe
dehydration, which may lead to mental confusion, drowsiness, seizures, and a
condition called non ketotic hyperglycaemic - hyperosmolar coma (Yin Yang
2002).
2.2.5 Diagnosis
The
fact that insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is thought to result from
interaction between genetic and environmental factors has lead to research
methods directed at prevention, early diagnosis and early control of the
disease. These methods include the identification of generically susceptive and
early intervention in newly diagnosed person with D.M.
The
use of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) only has been proposed for the screening and
diagnosis of diabetes, but its sensitivity has been reported to be
unsatisfactory. The use of HbA1C, alone or combined with FPG, has been
suggested for the screening of D.M. and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)
(Mannucci, 2003).
A
fasting plasma glucose (FPG) test measures blood glucose in a person who has
not eaten anything for at least 8 hours. This test is used to detect diabetes
and prediabetes mellitus. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGIT): It measures
blood glucose after the person drinks a glucose - containing beverage. This test can be used to diagnose diabetes
and prediabetes mellitus.
A
random plasma glucose test, also called a casual plasma glucose test, measures
blood glucose without regard to when the person being tested last. This test, along
with an assessment of symptoms, is used to diagnose D.M. but not prediabetes
mellitus. Test result indicating that a person has D.M. should be confirmed
with a second test on a different day.
The
FPG test is the preferred test for diagnosing D.M. because of its convenience
and low cost. How ever, it will miss some diabetes or prediabetes mellitus that
can be found with the OGTT. The FPG test is most reliable when done in the
morning. Result and their meaning are
shown below.
Table
1: People with a fasting glucose level of
100 - 125 milligram per deciliter (mg/dl) have a form of pre-diabetes mellitus
called impaired fasting glucose (IFG).
Having IFG means a person has an increased risk of developing type 2
D.M. but does not have it yet.
A
level of 12.6mg/dl or above, confirmed by repeating the test on another day,
means a person has D.M.
Table 1 FPG Test
Plasma
Glucose Result (mg/dl) Diagnosis 99mg/dl or below – normal.
100 to 125mg/dl - pre-diabetes
mellitus (impaired fasting glucose)
126mg/dl or above - D.M. confirmed by
repeating the test on a different day.
OGTT (Oral glucose toletance test).
Research has shown that the OGTT is
more sensitive than the FPG test for diagnosing prediabetes mellitus, but it is
less convenient to administer. The OGTT
requires fasting for at least 8 hours before the test. The plasma glucose level is measured
immediately before and 2 hours after a person drinks a liquid containing
75grams of glucose dissolved in water.
Results and their meaning are shown in Table 2, if the blood glucose
level is between 140 and 199mg/dl 2 hours after drinking the liquid, the person
has a form of prediabetes mellitus called impaired glucose tolerance
(IGT). Having IGT, like having IFG,
means a person has an increased risk of developing type 2 D.M. but does not
have it yet. A 2 hour glucose level of 200mg/dl or above, confirmed by
repeating the test on another day means a person has diabetes.
Table
2: OGTT
2 – hours plasma glucose result
(mg/dl) diagnosis 139mg/dl and below – normal.
140 to 199mg/dl – prediabetes mellitus
(impaired glucose tolerance) 200mg/dl and above – D.M. confirmed by repeating
the test on a different day.
2.2.6 Classification
DM
may first appear to any age, its prevalence rises dramatically in other
population from less than two cases per thousand children to almost two per
hundred adult in their sixties (Horwitz, 2002).
The national commission on D.M. in United States of America estimated
that 16.5% of person aged 56 years and 26% of 85 years old are diabetics (Horwitz,
2002)
·
Type
1 D.M. was previously called insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) or
juvenile - onset diabetes mellitus. Type
1 D.M. develops when the body immune system destroys pancreatic beta cells. The only cell in the body that make the hormone
insulin, that regulate blood glucose.
This form of D.M. usually strikes children and young adults, although
disease onset can occur at any age. Type
1 D.M. may account for 5% to 10% of all diagnosed case of D.M. risk factor for
type 1 D.M. may include auto immune, genetic and environmental factors.
·
Type
2 D.M. was previously called non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) or
adult onset diabetes mellitus. Type 2
diabetes mellitus may account for about 90% to 95% of all diagnosed cases of
D.M. It usually begins as insulin
resistance, a disorder in which the cells do not use insulin properly. As the need for insulin rises, the pancreas
gradually loses its ability to produce insulin. Type 2 D.M. is associated with
older age, obesity, family history of D.M., history of gestational diabetes
mellitus, impaired glucose metabolism, physical in activity and race/ethnicity.
African Americans, is Hispanic/latino americans and some Asian Americans and
native hawarians or other pacific
islanders are at particularly high risk for type 2 D.M. Type 2 D.M. is
increasingly being diagnosed in children and adolescents.
·
Latent
Auto immune Diabetes in Adults (LADA).
It is a type 1 diabetes mellitus
diagnosed in adults over 30 years, sometime known as type 1.5 D.M. LADA is
often misdiagnosed as type 2 D.M. because of age, however people with LADA do
not have insulin resistance like those with type 2 D.M., a gradual increase in
insulin requirements, positive antibodies and decreasing ability to make
insulin as indicated by a low C-peptide.
A fourth and very rare form of D.M. called monogenic D.M. is also
sometimes mistakes for type 1 D.M. but typically strikes new borns.
·
Gestational
D.M. is a form of glucose intolerance that is diagnosed in some women during
pregnancy. Gestational D.M. occurs more frequently among African Americans,
Hispanic/latino Americans and American Indians.
It is also more common among obese women and women with a family history
of D.M. during pregnancy, gestation diabetes mellitus requires treatment to
normalize maternal blood glucose levels to avoid complications in the
infant. After pregnancy 5% to 10% of
women with gestational D.M. are found to have type 2. D.M. women who have had
gestational D.M. have a 20% to 50% chance of developing D.M. in the next 5 - 10
years.
·
Other
specific types of D.M. result from specific genetic conditions (such as
maturity on set D.M. of youth), surgery, drugs malnutrition, infections and
other illnesses such types of D.M. may account for 1% to 5% of all diagnosed
cases of D.M.
2.2.7 Treatment
of D.M.
The objective of the treatment is to
help the patient to live a comfortable and useful life for as long as possible
D.M. is a chronic disease which cannot be cured except in very specific
situations. Management concentrates on keeping blood sugar level as close to
normal (“euglycemia”) as possible without causing hypoglyceamia. This can
usually be accomplished with diet, exercise and use of appropriate medications
(insulin in the case of type 1 d.M. oral medications as well as possible
insulin in type 2 D.M.)
·
Patient education
Understanding the participation is
vital since the complications of D.M. are far less common and less severe In
people who have well managed blood sugar levels. Attention is also paid to other health
problems that may accelerate the deleterious effects of D.M. These include smoking, elevated cholesterol
levels, obesity high blood pressure and lack of regular exercise.
·
Life Style
There are roles for patient education,
deistic support, sensible exercise, with the goal of keeping both short term
and long term blood glucose levels within acceptable bounds. In addition given the associated higher risk
of cardio vascular disease. Lifestyle
modifications are recommended to control blood pressure.
·
Medications
Oral medications (Anti-diabetic
medications) met form in is generally recommended as a first line treatment for
type 2 D.M. as there is good evidence that it decreases mortality.
Routine use of aspirin however has not
been found to improve outcomes in uncomplicated D.M.
Insulin - Insulin therapy
Type 1 D.M. is typically treated with
a combinations of regular and NPH insulin (Neutral protamine Hagedorn/Aumulin
N) or synthetic insulin analogs. When
insulin is used in type 1 D.M. a long acting formulation is usually added
initially while continuing oral medications. Dosage of insulin are then
increased to effect (Rother 2007).
Transplantation: In recent years,
researchers have focused increasing attention on transplantation for people
with type 1 D.M. current procedures include.
pancreas transplantation - pancreas
transplants have been performed since the late 1960s. Most are done in
conjunction with or after a kidney transplant.
Kidney failure is one of the most common complications of D.M. and
receiving a new pancreas when you receive a new kidney may actually improve
kidney survival.
Furthermore, after a successful
pancreas transplant many people with D.M. may no longer need to use insulin,
Unfortunately, pancreas transplants aren’t always successful. The persons body may reject the new organ
days or even years after the transplant, which means the person will need to
take immune suppressive drugs the rest of his/her life. These drugs are costly and can have serious
side effect including a high risk of infection and organ injury. Because the side effects can be more
dangerous to ones health than the D.M. transplantation is not always advisable
unless the person is experiencing serious complications.
islet cell transplantation - pancreas
contains about 1 million islet cells, 75 percent to 80 percent of which produce
insulin. The beta cells that produce
insulin reside in the islets. Although still considered an experimental
procedure, transplanting these cells may offer a less inuasive, less expensive and
less risky options than a pancreas transplant for people with D.M. (Mayo 2012).
·
Treatment modalities for older
patients
Treatment modalities available for older person with D.M.
are not different from those used in younger patients. However a number of special consideration
arise in their application to the elderly.
For instance the person already being treated with insulin may as he
grows older finds that stiffening joints make it difficult to fill the syringe
accurately or warning visual acquity leads to insulin does errors. (Horwitz,
2002). If appetite decreases or the
patient become too frail to eat regularly, glucose control may change even mild
degree of senile dementia may lead to poor compliance by a previously
consecutive patient or leading to increasing errors in diet or medications. Therapuetic
modalities include diet, exercise, hypoglyceamic drugs (insulin or oral agents)
and patient education (Horwitz, 2002).
Moreover,
the initial manifestation in other patients are more subtle, a symptomatically
and vague constitutional symptoms (loss of energy, fatigue) which make
diagnosis and treatment difficult (Horwitz, 2002). A particular severe
consequence of this may be non-ketotic hyperosmolar coma, which has high
mortality rate if not promptly and effectively treated. In the absence of this
life threatening presentation. However patients sometime do not accept the need
for treatment. Insulin is destroyed by the gastric juice hence it cannot be
given by mouth but has to be administered through subcutaneous injection, clear
insulin known as soluble insulin, when injected leads to a fall in the blood
sugar but it is short acting, that is why the use of intermediate and long
acting insulin is included in the treatment.
TABLE
2.1: SHOWING TYPE OF INSULINE
TYPES
OF INSULINE
|
ONSET
OF ACTION (HRS)
|
PEAK
OF ACTION
|
DURATION
OF ACTION (HPS)
|
Short acting or regular acting
|
30 mins-1 hour
|
2-5hours
|
5-8hours
|
Intermediate Acting (NPH) N
|
1-2 hours
|
4-12 hours
|
18-24 hours
|
Long Acting (ultralented) (u)
|
30mins - 3hours
|
10-20hours
|
30-36 hours
|
Rapid Acting
|
15-30minutes
|
30-90minutes
|
3-5 hours
|
Pre-mixed (Humulin 70/30)
|
3.0 minutes
|
2-4hours
|
14-24 hours
|
Rapid-Acting insulin covers insulin
needs for meals eaten at the same time as the injection. This type of insulin is used with longer
acting insulin.
Short-Acting insulin covers insulin
needs for meals eaten with 30-60 minutes.
Intermediate-Acting insulin covers
insulin needs for about half the day or overnight. This type of insulin is often combined with
rapid or short acting insulin.
Long-acting insulin covers insulin
needs for about one full day. This type
of insulin is often combined, when needed, with rapid or short acting insulin.
Pre insulins – these products are
generally taken twice a day before meal time. They are combination of specific proportions
of intermediate-acting and short acting insulin in one bottle or insulin pen
(the numbers following the brand name indicate the percentage of each type of
insulin) (Brunilda 2011).
NOTE: Insulin reacts differently in
individuals and the above chart is intended only as a general guideline based
upon. Insulin manufacturer,
information. The peak and duration of
insulin is affected by many things including individual response, time of the
day, exercise, stress, sickness and content of a meal (high-fat means can lead
to hypoglycemica).
·
Diabetes Needing Tablet
Many adult patient who develop D.M. can be controlled
with out resort to insulin. If they are
overweight the weight need to be reduced through reduction in the caloric
intake. This is referring to non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NFDDM). Several
types of sulphonylurea tablets are in common use to bring down the blood sugar.
These compounds stimulate the pancreas to produce more insulin. Tolbutamide and
glipizide have a short duration of action and are normally taken twice a day.
Chloropropamide and tolazamide has a longer action and once a day is effective.
Glibenclamide
has an intermediate strength of action, all these tablets are well tolerated by
the patients. Unfortunately they became ineffective if the diet is not adhere
to and they often give rise to increase in weight if the patients over eats. Since
the development of insulin, oral agent and to some extent also antibiotics,
there has been a considerable improvement in the survival rate and general
prognosis for D.M. must accept a major role in the management of his diseased
condition. His education must be updated
continuously since D.M. is a long life disease.
2.2.8 Dietary Management of D.M.
A
proper dietary management is the first and perhaps the most essential part of
D.M. treatment. There is a list of dietary do’s and don’ts that are associated
with D.M. In fact the dietary
restrictions are so severe that it may lead to mental trauma. In the patient,
and make the disease much more insufferable.
Yet dietary management is extremely necessary for people who wish to
keep their disease to a controllable level and to lead a longer life. The
purpose of dietary management is to attain or maintain ideal body weight and
ensure normal growth when insulin is given or taken special consideration must
be given to ensure adequate carbohydrate intake to correspond to the time when
the insulin is most effective and less carbohydrate when insulin is least effective
(Smeltzer & Bare 2002).
Although
diet cannot cure D.M. but at least it can be brought in control. Diet will help to monitor the level of the
blood sugar. The following are some suggestions to make a health diet for
controlling D.M. All bitter vegetables are excellent in reducing the blood
sugar level. One must consume one bitter
vegetable in every meal one take. One can choose between the vegetables such as
bitter leave, bitter gourd and bitter variety of drumstick.
Sour
foods containing high vitamin C in them are good for D.M. the Indian goose
berry, popularly known as the Amalaki and a prime component of the Amalaki and
a prime component of the Ayurvedic Triphala powder is very good in dissolving
excess fats in the body and in bringing the blood sugar level down. Reduction
of the total fat in take can be promoted/achieved by avoiding frying foods,
instead try other options such as baking, roasting, steaming, grilling which
requires little or no oil.
Red
meats contain more fatty acids than white meats. Avoiding mutton pork and beef, but chicken
and sea food are okay. The diabetic diet has traditionally been low in
carbohydrate content. However recent
studies have shown that the diet may be liberalized in this respect provided
that complex carbohydrate are given (Smith, 2003) when given in amounts
corresponding to 50g starch beans, in particular, raise the blood glucose level
to only a small extent and less than various other food stuff tested (Smith,
2003) various vegetable provided about 50% of the plant fibre on diet, the
content of insulin required by the patients was clearly reduced to maintain
unchanged or even improve control.
This
appeared that a diet rich in plant fibre and complex carbohydrate has definite
advantage for diabetic patient. Recently
studies clearly indicated that different sources of complex carbohydrate diet
markedly different post prandial glucose and insulin response both in normal
subjects and in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (Smith, 2003)
In
conclusion, treatment of D.M. with certain dietary fibre improve the diabetic
control and also may be beneficial by virtue of the lipid reduction achieved
(Smith, 2003). The diabetic diet is
still in its developing stage. The
function of different fibre fraction is not well known (Phillipson, 2003). It is wise to increase fibre food than to use
supplements or fibre medications with a high fibre diet the diabetic patients
can eventually decrease their insulin or tablet medication. Dietary fibre is defined as the substance in
the cell wall, vegetable passing undigested through the upper part of the
intestinal tracts no degradation taking place before they reach caecum
(Phillipson, 2003). These are various
type of fibre with different physiologic effect as it is shown below.
TABLE
2.2: SOME COMMON SOURCES OF DIETARY FIBRES
Fibre
fraction
sources
Cellulose
|
Bran, whole meal bread, dry beans
nuts, and beefs
|
Hemi cellulose
|
Bran, whole meal, bread, raddish,
beefs
|
Pectin Bran
|
Citrus fruits, apple, grapes,
berries
|
Lignin
|
Bran, whole meal flour and nuts.
|
Adapted from (Phillipson, 2003)
cellulose is made up of glucose units only, hemi cellulose also contains
pentose while pectin, contains uronic acids.
The fourth dietary fibre, lignin is not a carbohydrate in the cell wall
(Phillipson, 2003).
Insulin,
diet and exercise are the so called corner stones in joshns triad, which make
up the means for good treatment in D.M. (holm & Strom bald, 2003). A
diabetic diet must be sufficient in quantity to enable the patient to undertake
his activities, to satisfy his appetite and to maintain his weight at a proper
level A girl of slight physique learning a sedentary life may require a diet of
200chlories (8000kilo joules) a man doing a heavy labouring job may need
2,800chlories (11,500kj) or more. The
diet must contain an adequate amount of protein (at least 75%) and carbohydrate
(at least 180g). It must contain fruits
and vegetables with a high fibre content, the meal must also be spaced during
the day, with snacks in between meals, meals must be taken at regular times, as
delayed meals may lead to hypoglycaemia attack.
Compliance is best if diet is planned after a careful history to
determine patient’s usual eating habits reduction of simple sugars may be the
only change gradually rate than giving the patient a whole new diet at all
once. It may be desirable to restrict
fat consumption and emphasize polysaturated fats (Hortwitz, 2002).
2.2.9 Nutritional Care
Nutrition,
meal planning and weight control are the foundation of D.M. management. The
most important objectives in the dietary and nutritional management of D.M. are
control of total caloric in take to attain or maintain a reasonable body
weight, control of blood glucose levels and normalization of lipids and blood
pressure to prevent heart diseases. Success in the area alone is often
associated with reversal of hyperglycaemia in type 2 D.M. However, achieving these goals is not always
easy. Because medical nutrition therapy
(MNT, Nutritional management) of D,M. is complex. A registered dietitian who
understands D.M. management has the major responsibility for designing and
teaching this aspect of the therapeutic plan.
Nurses and all other members of the health care team must be knowledgeable
about nutritional therapy and supportive of patients who need to implement
nutritional and lifestyle changes nutritional management of D.M. include the
following goals American Diabetes Association (ADA, 2008b).
1. To
achieve and maintain
v
Blood
glucose levels in the normal range or as close to normal as is safely possible.
v
A
lipid and lipo protein profile that reduces the risk for vascular disease.
v
Blood
pressure level in the normal range or as close to normal as is safely possible.
2.
To
prevent, or at least slow, the rate of development of the chronic complications
of D.M. by modifying nutrient intake and lifestyle.
3.
To
address individual nutritional needs, taking into account personal and cultural
preferences and willingness to change.
4.
To
maintain the pleasure of eating by only limiting food choices when indicated by
scientific evidence.
For obese patients with D.M.
(especially those with type 2 D.M.), weight loss is the key to treatment.
(It is also a major factor in
preventing D.M.). In general, over
weight is considered to be a body mass Index (BMI) of 25 to 29, obesity is
defined as 20% above ideal body weight or a BMI equal to or greater than 30
(National Institute of health 2000). BMI
is a weight to height ratio calculated by dividing body weight (in kilograms)
by the square of the height (in metres).
Obese
patients who have type 2 D.M. and who require insulin or oral agents to control
blood glucose levels may be able to reduce or eliminate the need for medication
through weight loss. A weight loss as
small as 5% to 10% of total weight may significantly improve blood glucose
levels (ADA,
2009b). For obese patients with D.M. who do not take insulin or sulfonylureas,
consistent meal content or timing is important but not as critical. Rather, decreasing the overall caloric intake
assumes more importance. However, meals
should not be skipped spacing food intake throughout the day places more
manageable demands on the pancreas.
Consistently following a meal plan is
one of the most challenging aspects of D.M. management. It may be more realistic to restrict calories
only moderately. For patients who have
lost weight, maintaining the weight loss may be difficult. To help these patients in corporate new
dietary habits into their lifestyles, diet education, behavioural therapy,
group support and on going nutrition counseling are encouraged (Smeltzer &
Bare, 2010).
Table
2.3: below give selected sample means from exchange lists
Exchange
|
Sample
lunch 1
|
Sample
lunch 2
|
Sample
lunch 3
|
2 starch
|
2 slices bread
|
Hamburger bun
|
1 cup cooked pasta
|
3 meat
|
2 0z sliced turkey and 1 oz low fat
cheese
|
3 oz lean beef patty
|
3 oz boiled stirimp
|
1 vegetable
|
Lettuce,Tomato,onion
|
Green salad
|
½ cup plum tomatoes
|
1 fat
|
1 teaspoon mayornaise
|
1 teaspoon salad dressing
|
1 teaspoon olive oil
|
1 fruit
|
1 medium apple
|
1
¼ cup water melon
|
1 ¼ cup fresh stew barriers
|
“Free” items (optional)
|
Un sweetened iced tea mustard,
pickle, hot pepper
|
Diet soda. 1 teaspoon, eat
sup,pickle onions
|
Ice water with lemon, garlic basil.
|
2.2.10 Complications of D.M.
All forms of D.M. increase the risk of
long term complications. These typically
develop after many years (10-20 years), but may be the first symptom in those
who have otherwise not received a diagnosis before that time (1) Diabetic
ketoacidosis (DKA) is an acute and dangerous complication that is always a
medical emergency. Low insulin level cause the liver to turn this ketone for
five (i.e. ketosis) ketorne bodies are intermediate substance in the metabolic
sequence. This is normal when periodic but can become a serious problem if
sustained elevated blood level of ketone bodies decrease the blood’s ph,
leading to DKA on presentation to the hospital. The patient with DKA is
typically dehydrated, and breath rapidly and deeply, Abdomina pain is common
and may be severe when DKA is severe it can lead to lethargy, hypotension,
shock, brain oedema and death. Urine analysis will reveal significant level of
ketone bodies (which have exceeded their renal threshold blood levels to appear
in the urine, often before other over symptoms).
2.2.11 Hyperglycemia Hyperosomolar States (HHSS)
Non
ketotic hyperosmolar coma/hyperosmolar non ketotic state (HNS) is an acute
complication sharing many symptoms with DKA, but an entirely different origin
and different treatment. A person with very high (usually considered to be
above 300mg/dl (16mmol/l) blood glucose levels, water is osmotically drawn out
of cells into the blood and the kidney eventually begin to dump glucose into
the urine.
This
result in loss of water and an increase in blood osmolarity. If fluid is not replaced (by mouth or
intravenously) the osmotic effect of high glucose levels, combined with the
loss of water will eventually lead to dehydration, electrolyte imbalance are
also common and are always dangerous.
·
Hypoglycemia,
or abnormally low blood glucose, is an acute complication of several D.M.
treatment. It is rare otherwise, either
in diabetic or non-diabetic patients.
Patient may become agitated, sweaty, weak and have many symptoms of
sympathetic activation of the autonomic nervous system resulting in feelings a
kin to dread and immbolized panic.
·
Diabetic
coma is a medical emergency in which a person with D.M. is comatose
(unconscious) because of one of the acute complications of D.M. e.g. severe
diabetic hypoglycemia, diabetic keto acidosis the advanced form, and
hyperosmolar non ketotic come. The major long term complications relate to
damage blood vessels D.M. doubles the risk of cardiovascular disease. The main “macro vascular diseases” (related
to atherosclerosis of large arteries).
·
Arteriosclerosis:
Hardening of the arteries which leads to poor blood supply to the feet. A minor injury to toe may not heal on time
and is prone to infection and eventually may also lead to gangrene with
consequent amputation of the whole leg.
Stroke
and peripheral vascular disease, angina pectoris and myocardial infarction are
complication that are related to or due to damages to the vessel.
Macrovascular
disease leads to cardiovascular disease to which accelerated atherosclerosis is
a contributor.
Coronary
artery disease leading to angina or myocardial infarction (“heart attack”).
v
Diabetic
myonecrosis (muscle wasting)
v
Peripheral
vascular disease, which contributes to intermiltent elaudication (exertion
related leg and foot pain) as well as diabetic foot.
v
Stroke
(mainly the ischemic type)
D.M. also causes micro vascular
complications damages to the small blood vessels.
Diabetic
retinopathy! Which affects blood vessel formation in the retina of the eye, can
lead to visual symptoms, reduced vision and potentially blindness. Diabetic
nephropathy, the impact of D.M. on the kidneys can lead to scarring changes in
the kidney tissue, loss of small or progressively chronic kidney disease
requiring dialysis.
Diabetic neuropathy: Is the impact of diabetes on the
nervous system, most commonly causing numbness, tingling and pain in the feet
and also increasing the risk of skin damage due to altered Sensation. Together with vascular disease in the
legs. Neuropathy contributes to the risk
of skin damage due to altered sensation. Together with vascular disease in the
legs. Neuropathy contributes to the risk
of D.M. related to foot problem (such as diabetic foot ulcers) that can be
difficult to treat and occasionally require amputation.
Respiratory infections: The immune
response is impaired in individuals with D.M. cellular studies have shown that
hyperglyemia both reduces the function, of immune cells and increases
inflammation. The vascular effects of
D.M. also tends to alter lung function, all of which leads to an increase in
susceptibility to respiratory infections such as pneumonia and influenza.
Periodontal disease: D.M associated
with periodontal disease (gum disease) and may make D.M. more difficult to
treat. Gum disease is frequently related
to bacterial infection by organisms such as porphyromonas gingivalis and
actinobacillus and actinomycetem comitans. (Nathan & Mealey, 2006).
2.3 Empirical Literature Review
2.3.1 Emperical Studies of Compliance Behaviour
Compliance
as related to diet: Can be defined as the extent to which a patient’s behaviour
coincides with dietary advice (Wilkinson, 2008). Further in his studies reported that about
6-20% of patients fail to redeem their prescription and 30-35% delay or omit
doses. Poor compliance may produce adverse effect on the quantity of medical
care, may waste resources. Firstly, it interfered with therapeutic efforts by
reducing the benefits of the preventive or curative services offered.
Secondly non-compliance to
dietary regimen may cause unnecessary diagnostic and treatment procedures, thus
generating further costs.
2.3.2 Non
Compliance to diet regimen
Non compliance is defined as behaviour
of person and/or care giver that fails to coincide with a health promoting or
therapeutic plan agreed upon by the person (and/or family and/or community) and
health care professional, what is important in the definition is that the
patient for some reason (which will become the related factors) doesn’t follow
it, making it behavioural issues.Factors affecting compliance, including the
nurse/patient relationship, has allowed the evolution of “concordance”. Concordance views the patient as being the
equal of the equal of the health care provider and as having a right to make
informed decision. In a condition such
as D.M. which has many potential long term complications, it is vital that
concordance is embraced in the health care system. In order to improve care.
D.M. is a life long disease condition that has a complex treatment, and
requires behaviour changes on the part of the patient. If patient do not comply to the course of
treatment and adjustment in the behavioural changes thus leads to complication
from poorly controlled D.M.
Hence
the holistic approach to the care of the control of D.M. is vital and will
actually have a direct impact on the prevention of complication D.M.Rate of
non-compliance vary with estimates ranging from 50% to 80%. Greater compliance may be associated with a
decreased probability of diabetic complications. Non-compliance imposes an immense financial
burden on modern health care systems.
Such as the National Health Services (NHS), as well as imposing personal
cost on the individual patient low compliance can have detrimental effects on
medical research trials, reducing the value and the usefulness of studies.
Compliance
can also be defined as the extent to which a patient’s behavour in terms of
taking medication, following diets or implementing life style changes coincides
with medical or health advice (Vermeire, 2011).
2.3.3 Factors which Affect Compliance to Diet
Factors
which decrease compliance from the perspective of health care providers,
therapeutic compliance is a major effect on treatment outcomes and direct
Clinical consequences non-compliance is directly associated with poor treatment
outcomes in patients with D.M.Poor compliance with dietary therapy is the most
important reason for poorly controlled blood sugar level (Hajjar & Kotchen,
2008).
v
The
financial cost: Therapeutic non compliance has been associated with excess
urgent care visits, hospitalizations and higher treatment costs; (Bond, Hussar
& Suarstad, 2011). Some other factors that affect the compliance to diet
regimen are patient centered factors, demographic factors, age, ethnicity,
gender, education, marriage status, psychosocial factors, beliefs, motivation,
attitude patient-prescriber relationship, health literacy, patient knowledge,
physical difficulties, tobacco smoking or alcohol intake, forgetfulness,
History of good compliance.
v
Therapy
- related factors: Preparation complexity, Duration of the preparation of the
diets, degree of behavioral change required, taste of the diet quantity of food
to be taken lack of accessibility.
v
Social
and economic factors: Inability to take time off work, cost and income, social
support, disease factors, disease symptoms and severity of the disease (wal,
wong, check, tan, chua, mak, Aung & Lims 2008). Non
Compliance Due to Finance
From
the investigation clinical exposure and experience affect the role of finance
in the compliance to diet and during treatment regimen of D.M. can not be over
emphasized. Many patients, who are well
educated and known the implication of non-compliance to treatment are being in
capacitated to produce expensive drugs (both oral agents and insulin, as well
as expensive therapeutic diet that D.M. involved).
Therefore
when patient cannot afford their medical care due to the high cost of treatment
and cost of special diet is affecting compliance to such treatment. The economic barriers to medical care are the
primary factors. There are so many cases
in which the relative affordability of treatment affects degrees of compliance
in patients who are able to pay at least some of their medical expenses.
There
is no doubt that illness imposes a burden on our, resources in two ways. First resources are used up to prevent
diagnosis and treat disease. These costs
which include expenses of hospital care, consultations with physician , Nursing
care rendered, drug diet, etc. are called direct economics costs. Secondly resources are lost because those
afflicted by illness cannot take part in the production of goods and services,
included in these indirect economic costs to the production cost due to short
term illness permanent disability and death prior to retirement age. Smith (2012)
state that failure to adhere to treatment instruction has been estimated to be
reason for 25% of all Australians hospitals administration leading to avoidable
examples
In conclusion, the investigation has
been able to discuss D.M. extensively in this review in terms of its meaning,
causes clinical manifestation, diagnosis, types or classification, treatment
modalities in both IDDM and NIDDM, dietary management, exercise, complication
and the meaning of compliance and non compliance as it affect D.M. factors
which decreased it. Compliance factors
which affects, its compliance, its non-compliance to drug and diet.
2.3.4 Information Needed to Maximize Compliance
For
the successful attempts to improve patient compliance depend upon a set of key
factors. These include realistic assessment of patient’s knowledge and
understanding of the regimen, clear and effective communication between health
professionals and their patients and the nurturance of trust in the therapeutic
relationship.
Patients
must be given the opportunity to tell the story of their unique illness
experiences. Knowing the patient as a
person allows the health professional to understand element that are crucial to
the patients compliance, beliefs, attitudes, subjective norms, cultural
context, social supports and emotional health challenges, particularly
depression, physician - patient partnership are essential when choosing among
various therapeutic options to maximize compliance.
Mutal
collaboration fosters greater patient satisfaction, reduces the risks of non
adherence, and improves patients health care outcomes.
The
advice given to patients by their health care professionals to cure or control
diseased condition is too often misunderstood, carried out incorrectly, forgotten
or even completely ignored so this can be avoid by given the patient adequate,
understand and using appropriate language the patient can understand when
caring for them (Dimateo 2008).
2.3.5 Factors Contributing to patient Not
Complying to Eating and Drinking in
Hospital
Problems with ordering of food is the
first factor, patients should be given a choice of meals few when a special
diet as the case in D.M. patient, they should be allowed to choose from their
local diets that are not control indicated to their ailment in correct
proportion.
Communication must be effective
between the Nursing staff, catering staff and the patients. In some hospital,
the distribution and collection of meals is shared by Nursing staff. For instance nurse may dish out the mutals
and the catering staff may clear them away.
Problem may arise because there is no system for monitoring and
reporting whether food has been eaten, to the Nursing staff. For the out patient, the close relatives and
friends should be educated on how to comply with the dietary, regimen for the
majority of people the general appearance of a meal is important and
contributes to whether or not a person will eat it. People who are ill often experience a loss of
appetite, so the appearance of meals takes on great significance. A lack of variety of food on the menu can
also have effect on patients.
Unfortunately for developing Countries like Nigeria, not many people will be
able to afford varieties because of the poor economic situation.
Food should be contently prepared and
appropriate to patients needs. The
available food may be unsuitable for patients with specify dietary requirement.
For example, people from minority ethnic group may not be catered for and the
Vegetarian. Moreover, a Yoruba man, in
Nigeria for example may find himself being hospitalized in a hospital in a far
Northern part of the Country or far Eastern part of the Country there is no
doubt that such a patient will be confronted with problem of non-compliance
with his diet. Therefore, patients
should be asked about their personal dietary needs before admission so that
his/her special diet will be tailored towards his food preference and this will
enhance dietary compliance.
It
is often suggested that hospitals should serve meals at times of the day which
reflect the normal eating time of the majority of people instead of being
dictated by the need of the catering and Nursing staffs, some hospitals give a
wide gap before serving another meal. This
wide gap is frequently a cause for compliant among many patients, eating
environment in which meals are served plays an important role in whether or not
patients eat their meals wherever possible, patient should be given the choice
of eating in a designated dining area.
Some people may be embarrassed about their eating habits and may want to
eat alone. Other group of people may not
feel able to socialize at meal time e.g. depressed patients and alternate place
is suggested for these type of patients.
Dietary
recommendations for the management of D.M. have changed over the past 16
years. There is now a reduced emphasis
on the importance of carbohydrate in the diet.
v
Non
Compliance Due to Finance
From
the investigation clinical exposure and experience affect the role of finance
in the compliance to diet and during treatment regimen of D.M. can not be over
emphasized. Many patients, who are well
educated and known the implication of non-compliance to treatment are being in
capacitated to produce expensive drugs (both oral agents and insulin, as well
as expensive therapeutic diet that D.M. involved).
Therefore
when patient cannot afford their medical care due to the high cost of treatment
and cost of special diet is affecting compliance to such treatment. The economic barriers to medical care are the
primary factors. There are so many cases
in which the relative affordability of treatment affects degrees of compliance
in patients who are able to pay at least some of their medical expenses.
There
is no doubt that illness imposes a burden on our, resources in two ways. First resources are used up to prevent
diagnosis and treat disease. These costs
which include expenses of hospital care, consultations with physician, Nursing
care rendered, drug diet, etc. are called direct economics costs. Secondly resources are lost because those
afflicted by illness cannot take part in the production of goods and services,
included in these indirect economic costs to the production cost due to short
term illness permanent disability and death prior to retirement age. Smith (2012)
state that failure to adhere to treatment instruction has been estimated to be
reason for 25% of all Australians hospitals administration leading to avoidable
examples.
A cross sectional study was conducted
and multistage stratified random sample method was used for the selection of
600 diabetic patients. Data were
collected by means of an interviewing questionnaire, an observation checks
list, review of prescriptions and laboratory investigations. A scoring system
was made for a diabetic patient is knowledge and skills, patient’s compliance,
doctor - patient relationship, and glyemic control. Result showed that about
57% always took their medication as prescribed by doctor and on time, only 2.2%
always complied with dietary regimen, while no one reported regular compliance
with exercise regimen. Complications of the regimen were the exercise regimen.
A complication of the regimen was the commonest cause (63.3%) of non
compliance. A highly statistically significant difference was found between
compliance with all regimens and patients knowledge of diabetes. The scores for
doctor patient relationship were all unsatisfactory results of glycosylated
hemogloblin (HbAIc) revealed that metabolic control of four - fifth of the
patients was satisfactory, 12% had fair and 8% had poor metabolic control.
The
personal and socio-demographic characteristics of the sample of 600 diabetic
patients indicated that men represented 48.3% of the sample while women formed
51.7%; the men to women ratio being 1:11. The age of diabetic patients ranged
from 25 to 81years, with a mean age 47.688+11.94 years. Marriage
patients comprised 83.0% and 10.8% were single. About one-third (34.5%) of
diabetic patients were illiterate and 42.2% were manual workers.
An
analysis of result revealed that about two third (64.3%) of the sample got
their knowledge from physicians, 19.3% from nurses, 18.7% from relative and
4.8% from other diabetic patients. Most patients gave more than one cause for
non-compliance. About two third of patients (63.3%) said that the
non-compliance was because they did not understand the drugs lack of knowledge
about drugs was mentioned by 51.3% whereas the reason were financial for 27% of
the patient www. Tochi. Nmmh - gov > journal list > J family common med
> 11.17(3)l 01/09/12.
2.3.6 Factors influencing compliance to dietary
regimen
patient satisfaction to the service
given to them, diet and drug supervision by Nurses and Physicians, patients
expectations, been met, physicians accept patients family agrees with physician
degree of disability, adapted from nursing times, 2003 (by Barbara).
2.3.61 Information needed to maximize compliance
- Food that the patient can avoid.
- Some drugs react with certain foods and may make a patient feel III or pose a potential danger. The patient must know and understand the reason why these foods should be avoided.
- The kind of food they should be eating should be explain to them, hell them the component and the importance of the food to there health. The mode of preparation.
- The kind of language that will be understood by the patient should be used during health education or explanation to aid effective communication.
If
the patient is unable to read the information and instructions on the label,
it must be explained to the patient
and his understanding of the instruction must be assessed list of food should
be given to them and it should be made available in different languages they
can understand and it should include food they can be eaten and those they should
avoid. The reason for the avoidance should be stated and the complication of
non-avoidance or adherence to the diet should be explained to them.
·
Clients
should be taught the means of preparation of the food and the places where the
can get the food items and the diet regimen should be communicated to them.
For the successful attempts to improve
patient compliance depend upon a set of key factors. These include realistic
assessment of patient’s knowledge and understanding of the regimen, clear and
effective communication between health professionals and their patients and the
nurturance of trust in the therapeutic relationship. Patients must be given the
opportunity to tell the story of their unique illness experiences. Knowing the patient as a person allows the
health professional to understand element that are crucial to the patients
compliance, beliefs, attitudes, subjective norms, cultural context, social
supports and emotional health challenges, particularly depression, physician –
patient partnership are essential when choosing among various therapeutic
options to maximize compliance.
Mutual
collaboration fosters greater patient satisfaction, reduces the risks of non-
adherence, and improves patients health care outcomes. The advice given to
patients by their health care professionals to cure or control diseased
condition is too often misunderstood, carried out incorrectly, forgotten or
even completely ignored so this can be avoid by given the patient adequate,
understand and using appropriate language the patient can understand when
caring for them (Dimateo 2004).
In conclusion, the investigation has
been able to discuss D.M. extensively in this review in terms of its meaning, causes clinical
manifestation, diagnosis, types or
classification, treatment modalities in both IDDM and NIDDM, dietary
management, exercise, complication and the meaning of compliance and non
compliance as it affect D.M. factors which decreased it. Compliance factors which affects, its
compliance, its non-compliance to drug and diet. Information needed to maximize compliance.
2.4 Conceptual Model
The
theoretical framework for this study shall be behavior models by (Jacqueline
Dunbar 2007). Management of diabetes
typically requires the patient to make frequent alterations in her or his diet,
physical activity level, glucose measurement. Schedule and medication
administration. To encourage these changes or behaviour and to instruct
patients on how to do so safely, the clinician must have a sound understanding
of the relationship between the treatment elements and the clinical outcome
they produce. In addition, most people
with diabetes also have other conditions that require specific management
regimens. Minimizing the patient’s self
care burden by integrating the regimens can be a challenge for the diabetes
educator.
2.41 Common Element In Behaviour Change Models
There
are only a few effective strategies for promoting and sustaining behaviour
change in people who have diabetes mellitus and con-comitant chronic conditions. These strategies usually basic education (to
address low health literacy), help with setting goals, engendering a sense of
control (self-efficacy), arranging for professional or social support and
providing feed back. All successful
models begin with clearly defining the desired change or behaviour,
establishing a baseline and encouraging the patient to self monitor her or his
progress. In most cases multiple
interventions are necessary and only modest changes in behaviour can be
espected.
2.42 Specifying the Behaviour
Instructing
someone to “increase exercise” or “take your medication” and to work toward
clinical goals such as “lower your cholesterol” are unlikely to be
helpful. Patients are unlikely to change
unless they are given aspeutic description of the behaviour to be
undertaken. For example, saying walk at
your normal pace for 30 minutes five days a week, either for 30 minutes at one
time or for 15 minutes twice a day” gives patients a concrete goal on that
clinicians then can use to monitor behaviour and evaluate its contribution to
clinical outcomes.
2.43 Encouraging Self-monitoring
In
all models of behaviour charge assessment is critical. It is important for the clinician to
understand the patients existing behaviour and to establish the baseline
behaviour. It’s not enough for the
patient to know what to do and intends to do it, what matters is what the
patient does how often, and under what conditions. It’s crucial for the clinician to understand
the circumstances (environmental, social, financial and attitudinal) that help
or hinder the patient in making changes. For example, the patient may not have
the financial resources to join a health club and may live in a neighborhood
that is unsafe for outside exercise or even walking on the other hand, the
patient may live a 10 minutes bus ride form a community center with a gym where
she or he can begin using an exercise bike.
Understanding these circumstances can help the clinician and patient
plan for behavior change.
Because
memory for the specific details of behavior (what, when, how and under what
circumstances) tends to be poor. Some
form of recorded self monitoring is needed. For example, the patient may keep a
daily or complete a daily checklist of activities. Self monitoring is very useful, but its
requires the patient to recognize and record her or his behavior.
2.44 Help with setting goals
Research suggests that setting
specific goals leads to greater behavior change than having vague or no
goals. The patient must be interested in
achieving the goal and it should not conflict with other goal. The patient must be interested in achieving
the goal and its should not conflict with other goals. In complex situations such as a regimen
designed to treat multiple conditions, including D.M. It is important that there be sub goals, a
strategic plan for moving toward them and regular feed back on
performance. Goals should be challenging
but attainable, taking into account the person’s ability and perceived sell
efficiency.
2.45 Engendering self-efficacy is critical for
successful behavior change.
According to Bandura (2002) “Perceived
self, efficacy is defined as people’s judgments of their capabilities to
organize and execute courses of action required to attain designated types of
performances. It is not concern with the
skills one has self-efficacy theory suggests that goals should be attainable in
the near future, because immediate success can provide motivation and enhance
efficacy. Indeed, the strongest
influence on self-efficacy is mastery.
Successfully completing easy tax does not strengthen efficacy on the
other hand failure can harm it.
2.46 Developing knowledge
To change behavior, the patient must
understand what to do and how to do it.
The patient needs enough knowledge to adjust the treatment or prevention
regimen in response to changing circumstances.
Learning relies heavily on the educator’s ability to adapt teaching
strategies to the individual and on the patients ability to process
information. Because poor glycemic
control and cognitive dysfunction are associated, it is among the numerous
tactors that can affect the ability of the patient with D.M. to process
information. Health literacy the ability to apply skills such as reading and
interpreting medication labels to functioning effectively as patient also
contributes to the patient’s ability to comprehend and apply knowledge to
modifying behavior. Patients with poor
health literacy often do not understand dosing instructions and are not able to
interpret a blood glucose value.
Instructional
strategies can make it easier for the patient to change her or his behavior
perhaps the most important strategy is to teach only a small amount at time
just enough to support behavior change.
The instructor should focus on the behavior and how to carry it out
correctly, rather than on the reason for the change language should be simple
group information into categories has been shown to increase recall. For example “let’s talk about self monitoring
of what you eat. First we’ll review what
goes into a food diary, next we’ll talk about when to do the recording. Then we’ll discuss how to review the diary to
identify problem areas.
2.47 Giving Feed Back
Allow
patients the opportunity to demonstrate their understanding and then give them
feed back on their progress. Feed back
may consist of verbal comments, modeling, or demonstration or chart or other
graphics, such as a checklist for medication wage.Bandura (2002) noted that the
type of feed back that is best varies according to the stage of behavior change
initially, feed back should support the patient’s capabilities, as skills
develop, feed back should be informative, with the educator advising the
patient in a way that enhances suggested that feed back focus on the individual
comparing the patient’s current performance to her or his past behavior rather
than to that of other patients.
In
conclusion, the investigation has been able to discuss D.M. extensively in
this review
in terms of its meaning, causes clinical manifestation, diagnosis, types
or classification, treatment
modalities in both IDDM and NIDDM, dietary management, exercise, complication and the meaning
of compliance and non compliance as it affect D.M. factors which decreased
it. Compliance factors which affects,
its compliance, its non-compliance to drug and diet. Information needed to maximize compliance.
2.5 Conceptual framework
Dependent Variables
2.51 Application of the framework
As
earlier discussed Jacqueiline Dunbar Model said that management of diabetes
typically requires the patient to make frequent alternations in his or her
diet, physical activity level, glucose measurement, Schedule and medication
administration.
However, various factors like unemployment
status (finance) attitude of the care givers, cultural belief, family support,
socio - economic status, level of education, contribute to the poor compliance
of diabetic patient to dietary regimen at the diabetic clinic. The compliance
can therefore be improved in all the intervening variables are properly
controlled by the client.
2.6 Research Questions
1. Will the level of education affect level
of compliance to dietary regimen among diabetic patients?
2. Will the gender influence level of compliance
to dietary regimen among diabetic patients?.
3. Will the level of family support have
anything to do with level of compliance to dietary regimen among diabetic
patients?.
4. Will the socio-economic status influence
level of compliance to dietary regimen among diabetic patients?.
5. Will the physician’s attitude influence
level of compliance to dietary regimen among diabetic patients?.
2.7 Research
Hypothesis
For this study 5 null hypothesis will
be tested at 0.05 level of significant.
* There is no significant relationship
between the level of compliance to dietary regimen and the educational status
of respondent.
* There is no significant relationship
between sex and level of compliance to dietary regimen.
* There is no significant relationship between
level of compliance to dietary regimen and the level of family support.
* There is no significant relationship
between socio-economic status and level of compliance to dietary regimen among
respondents.
* There is no significant difference in
the level of compliance to dietary regimen and other treatment modalities among
respondents.
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
This chapter focuses on the research designs, the
settings, ethical consideration, target population, sample technique, sample
size research instrument, pilot study, procedure for data collection and plan
for data analysis.
3.2 Research Design
This is a descriptive cross-sectional
research. This design was adopted because the research was interested in explaining
and describing the phenomenon of interest as they occur and no part will be
manipulated.
3.3 Research Setting
The setting of the study was a
purposively selected tertiary health institution in Osun State,
known as Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital
Osogbo. It is cited at the central of
Osogbo, with two main entrance, one at the Idiseke Area and the second gate
opposite the Ansarudeen Central Mosque division towards Ajegunle Area in Osogbo. These category of patients receive out
patient care and those that are on admission in the Hospital medical
wards. The study will be conducted in
Osogbo, in Osun State
of Nigeria
at the Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital Osogbo where
the out patient in the clinic and in patient will be used for the study.
3.4 Target Population
The target population for this study are patients
receiving treatment in the medical wards in Ladoke Akintola University of
Technology Teaching Hospital Osogbo, Osun
State. This study was conducted on a population of patients in both
the out patient clinic which have been previously diagnosed with D.M and those
patient on the ward who have been diagnosed of having D.M. The age range was between 20 years and 50 years plus.
3.5 Sampling Technique
For this study purposive, accidental or convenience
sampling techniques was used in selecting my sample. I attended the D.M. clinic for almost 10 day
to get my sample size which was a total of (109) patients. All D.M. patient that have been previously
diagnosed, and are attending clinic regularly were selected, and their names
was written down so that they will not be reselected on another clinic day.
Sample
Size
My
sample size was selected by going to the Hospital to ask for the numbers of
D.M. patients that previously attended the clinic in the previous year. The total was 150. Using Yamare (1967) in determination of my
sample size
n =
N where n = size, N =
Total population of the study,
1+N (e) 2 e =
significant level (0.05) n = 150___
1 + 150 (0.05) 2
n = 150 =109
1.375
The sample size for the study was 109.
3.6 Pilot Study
The
pilot study was conducted in Osun State Hospital Asubiaro Osogbo among the D.M.
patient attending the clinic. The final
draft of the instrument was used for the pilot study. The pilot study enables the researcher to
access any problem that might come up during the administration of the
instrument (Harthrone effect). It also
help to determine the validity and reliability of the instrument that was used for the study.
3.7 Validity and Reliability of the instrument
The
content validity of the instrument was ascertained the rough the effort of the
researcher’s supervisor, has he went through the instrument and those ones that
were ambiguous were removed hences, face validity of the instrument was
determined. The reliability of the instrument was determined by administering
the instrument to ten (10) respondent that has the same characteristic with the
respondent were used, with the use of test – retest reliability method using
the spearman - Brown correlation coefficient yield 0.78 which is 78% reliable
which means this instrument is reliable to be used to tap the information
needed for this research.
3.8 Instrument for Data Collection
The
main instrument for data collection is a self administered questionnaires which
comprised of both closed ended and an open ended questions. Observation technique will be used on
patients at home during home visiting to do certain whether the patients were
taking their diet as recommended and drugs as prescribed. Similarly the family members of D.M. patient
was interview to confirm whether the patient is complying or not with dietary
regimen.
3.9 Type of Data Collection and Analysis
The
instrument/questionnaire was administer to patient and the information gathered
from this instrument was now analyzed using descriptive and differential
analysis. The demographic variables and
the research questions was analyzed through descriptive analysis inform of
frequencies, percentage and graphs. The
hypothesis will be tested using chi-square.
3.10 Limitation of the Study
The limitation of this study was
associated with the type of self-designed questionnaire administered which was
subjected to face validity and the method of sampling. Another limitation were
not unconnected with the number respondents because descriptive study requested
the use of large number of subjects.
Moreso, many of the subject did not
say the truth based on all the questions raised and some of the questions
administered were not returned.
3.11 Ethical Consideration
Formal permission was taken from the
institution involved in the study and informed consent was gained from all
subjects that participates in the study.
3.12 Administration of the Questionnaire
One
hundred and nine representatives from the target population was selected from
the study.
Table 4.10: Showing the
Demographic Variable of Respondents
Age
|
||||
Valid
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid
percent
|
Cumulative
|
20-29
|
23
|
21.1
|
21.1
|
21.1
|
30-39
|
11
|
10.1
|
10.1
|
31.2
|
40-49
|
32
|
29.4
|
29.4
|
60.6
|
50
years and above
|
43
|
39.4
|
39.4
|
100.0
|
Total
|
109
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
Sex
|
||||
Male
|
22
|
20.2
|
20.2
|
20.2
|
Female
|
87
|
79.8
|
79.8
|
100.0
|
Total
|
109
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Level
of education
|
||||
No
formal education
|
20
|
18.3
|
18.3
|
18.3
|
Primary
education
|
33
|
30.3
|
30.3
|
48.6
|
Secondary
education
|
20
|
18.3
|
18.3
|
67.0
|
Post
Secondary education
|
26
|
23.9
|
23.9
|
90.8
|
University
education
|
10
|
9.2
|
9.2
|
100.0
|
Total
|
109
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
Occupational
status
|
||||
Civil
servant
|
36
|
33.0
|
33.0
|
33.0
|
Farming
|
10
|
9.2
|
9.2
|
42.2
|
Self
employed
|
41
|
37.6
|
37.6
|
79.8
|
Schooling
|
14
|
12.8
|
12.8
|
92.7
|
Pensineer
|
8
|
7.3
|
7.3
|
100.0
|
Total
|
109
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
Marital
status
|
||||
Single
|
11
|
10.1
|
10.1
|
10.1
|
Married
|
43
|
39.4
|
39.4
|
49.5
|
Divorced
|
22
|
20.2
|
20.2
|
69.7
|
Widowed
|
33
|
30.3
|
30.3
|
100.0
|
Total
|
109
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
Religion
|
||||
Christianity
|
65
|
59.6
|
59.6
|
59.6
|
Islam
|
33
|
30.3
|
30.3
|
89.9
|
Traditional
|
11
|
10.1
|
10.1
|
100.0
|
Total
|
109
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
Ward
|
||||
Male
medical ward
|
38
|
34.9
|
34.9
|
34.0
|
Female
medical ward
|
28
|
25.7
|
25.7
|
60.6
|
General
out patient clinic
|
43
|
39.4
|
39.4
|
100.0
|
Total
|
109
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
According to table 4.10:
23 (21.1%) of the respondents were
between the age 20-20years, 11 (10.1%) were between the age 30-39years, 32
(29.4%) were between the age 40-
49years, while 43 (39.4%) were 50
years and above.
Also 22 (20.2%) of the respondents
were male, while 87 (79.8%) were female.
The table also shows that 20 (18.3%)
of the respondents have no formal education, 33 (30.3%) have primary education,
20 (18.3%) have secondary education, 26 (23.9%) have post secondary education,
while 10 (9.2%) have university education.
It is also shows from the table that
36(33.0%) of the respondents were civil servant, 10(9.2%) were farmer, 41
(37.6%) were self employed, 14 (7.3%) were student, while 8 (7.3%) were
pensioner.
Also 11 (10.1%) of the respondents
were single, 43 (39.4%) were married, 22 (20.2%) were divorced, while 33
(30.3%) were widowed.
The table also shows that 65 (59.6%)
of the respondents were Christian, 33 (30.3%) were Moslem, while 11 (10.1%)
were traditional religion worshippers.
Also 38 (34.9%) of the respondents
were from male medical ward, 28 (25.7%) were from female medical ward, while 43
(39.4%) were from General out patient clinic.
Answering of Research Questions
Answering of Research Questions
Research
Question 1: States
that will level of education influence level of compliance to dietary regimen
among D.M patients.
Inference:
In Table 4.10 above, items
showed that level of education influence level of compliance to dietary regimen
among D.M patients because larger percentage of the respondents i.e 33% have
primary school education.
Research
Question 2: States that will gender influence level of
compliance to dietary regimen among D.M patients.
Inference: In table 4.10 above, item 2 showed
that 79.8% of the respondents are female.
Research
Questions 3: States
that will level of family support have any thing to do with level of compliance
to dietary regimen.
Inference: In figure 4.19 above, item 31 showed
that larger percentage of the respondents i.e. 76.1% of the respondents said
their families are staying with them.
Research
Question 4: States
that will socio economic status influence level of compliance to dietary
regimen.
Inference: In Table 4.10 above, item 5 showed
that higher percentage i.e 37.6% of the respondents are self employed.
Testing
of hypothesis
Hypothesis 1: There is no significant relationship
between the level of compliance to dietary regimen and the educational status
education and level of compliance to dietary regimen.
Level of Educational
Status and Level of Compliance
|
|
How
often do you check your weight?
|
|
|||
|
|
6
months interval
|
3
months interval
|
Monthly
|
Weekly
|
Total
|
Level of education
Total
|
No formal education
Primary education Secondary education
Post secondary education
University education
|
0
22
0
11
0
33
|
11
11
0
0
0
22
|
8
0
20
15
0
43
|
1
0
0
0
10
11
|
20
33
20
26
10
109
|
Chi-Square
Tests
|
Value
|
Df
|
Asymp. Sig
(2-sided)
|
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
|
290 a
168.481
16.479
109
|
1
1
1
|
.780
000
.000
|
X2-
Calculated = 0.780, X2-table = 0.290, df = 1, P = 0.05
Inference: Since the table value (0.290) is less
than calculated value (0.780) at 0.05 level of significant, it implies that
there is significant relationship between the level of compliance to dietary
regimen and the educational status. Therefore the null hypothesis is
significant and hence rejected.
Testing
of hypothesis
Hypothesis
2: There is no
significant relationship between sex and level of compliance to dietary
regimen.
Sex
and level of compliance
|
|
Which
of the following do you think can cause diabetes mellitus
|
|
||
|
|
Bulk
food containing carbohydrate
|
Plenty
meat, vegetable and little water
|
Beans
product and meat
|
Total
|
Sex
Total
|
Male
Female
|
0
56
56
|
0
20
20
|
22
11
33
|
22
87
109
|
Chi-Square
Tests
|
Value
|
df
|
Asymp. Sig
(2-sided)
|
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
|
63.479a
67.630
51.881
109
|
2
2
1
|
.000
.000
.000
|
a.
1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 4.04.
Inference: Since the table value (63.479) is
greater than calculated value (0.000) at 0.05 level of significant, it implies
that there is significant relationship between sex and level of compliance to
dietary regimen. Therefore the null hypothesis is not significant and hence
accepted.
Testing
of hypothesis
Hypothesis
3: There is no
significant relationship between level of compliance to dietary regimen and the
level of family support.
Level
of family support and level of compliance
|
Management of diabetes mellitus is a
daily discipline
|
|
||
Yes
|
No
|
Total
|
||
Is any of your family members
staying with you?
Total
|
Yes
No
|
64
25
89
|
19
1
20
|
83
26
109
|
Chi-Square
Tests
|
Value
|
Df
|
Asymp. Sig
(2-sided)
|
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
|
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
|
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likilihood Ratio
Fisher’s Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
|
.793b
.606
.128
749
109
|
1
1
1
1
|
1.029
.058
013
.029
|
.039
|
021
|
- Computed only for a 2 x 2 table
- 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.77
X2 – Calculated = 1.029,
X2-table =0.793, df = 1, P=0.05
Inference: Since the table value (0.793) is less
than calculated value (1.029) at 0.05 level of significant, it implies that
there is significant relationship between level of compliance to dietary
regimen and the level of family support. Therefore the null hypothesis is
significant and hence rejected.
Testing
of hypothesis
Hypothesis
4: There is no
significant relationship between socio-economic status and level of compliance
to dietary regimen among respondents.
Count Socio economic
status and compliance
|
Diabetes
diet are expensive?
|
Total
|
||
Yes
|
No
|
|||
Occupation
Status
Total
|
Civil servant
Farming
Self employed
Schooling
Pensiner
|
30
0
28
10
8
76
|
6
10
13
4
0
33
|
36
10
41
14
8
109
|
Chi-Square
Tests
|
Value
|
Df
|
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
|
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
N of Valid Cases
|
2.721a
3.260
.136
109
|
4
4
1
|
6.030
1.330
.712
|
a. 3 cells (30.0%) have expected count
less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.42.
X2 – Calculated – 6.030, X2 – table =
2.721, df = 4, P = 0.05
Inference: Since the table value
(2.721) is less than calculated value (6.030) at 0.05 level of significant, it
implies that there is significant relationship between socio-economic status
and level of compliance to dietary regimen among respondents. Therefore the
null hypothesis is significant and hence rejected.
There is no significant different in
the level of compliance to dietary regimen and other treatment modalities.
Hypothesis
5: There is no
significant between in the level of compliance to dietary regimen and other
treatment modalities.
Count Drug
management and compliance
|
Have you been coping with dietary
regiment given to you in the hospital
|
|
||
Yes
|
No
|
Total
|
||
Which of the means of treatment are
you using
Total
|
Drugs only
Drugs and diet
Herbal preparation
Insulin
|
10
41
20
15
86
|
1
11
7
4
23
|
11
52
27
19
109
|
Chi-Square Tests
|
Value
|
df
|
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
|
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
|
1.331a
1.509
.463
109
|
3
3
1
|
.722
.680
.496
|
a.
2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is
2.32.
X2 – Calculated = 0.722, X2
– table = 1.331, df = 3, P = 0.05
Inference: Since the table value
(1.331) is greater than calculated value (0.722) at 0.05 level of significant,
it implies that there is no significant different in the level of compliance to
dietary regimen and other treatment modalities. Therefore the null hypothesis
is not significant and hence accepted).
The hypothesis revealed that
Ø
There was significant relationship between the level of compliance of
dietary regimen and the educational status of respondent.
Ø
That there was no relationship between sex and level of compliance to
dietary regimen.
Ø
There was significant relationship between level of compliance to
dietary regimen and the level of family support.
Ø
There was significant relationship between socio-economic status and
level of compliance to dietary regimen among respondent.
Ø
There was significant relationship with type of management and level of
compliance to treatment among respondent.
Table 4.24 shows that 28
(25.7%) of the respondents said they would note the spacing of their previous
meal if their urine contain too much sugar, 69 (63.3%) said they would reduce
the quality of all food to be taken, while 12 (11.0%) said they don’t know.
Section
c: Family support
Table 4.25 shows that 36 (33.0%) of
the respondents said their family member accompanied them to the clinic, while
73 (67.0%) said not they are not.
Table 4.26 shows that 79 (72.5%) of
the respondents said they accept them and the type of treatment they are
passing through, while 30 (27.5%) said no they are not.
Table 4.27 shows that 87 (79.8%) of
the respondents said they encourage them in anyway to ensure that they take
their drugs at home and carry out follow up care, while 22 (20.2%) said no they
are not.
Table 4.28 shows that 79 (72.5%) of
the respondents said they are encourage to discuss their health problem at
home, while 30 (27.5%) said no they are not.
Table 4.29 shows that 77 (70.6%) of
the respondents said their family member do assist them in the purchase of
drugs or reinforce them financially in terms of their management, while 32
(29.4%) said no they are not.
Appendix
Section
B: Knowledge on diabetes mellitus and perception of dietary regimen.
Table 4.11:
Do
you think diabetes can be treated?
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
Valid Yes
|
87
|
79.8
|
79.8
|
79.8
|
No
|
22
|
20.2
|
20.2
|
100.0
|
Total
|
109
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
Table
4.12
Do you think is curable?
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid
Percent
|
Cumulative
Percent
|
Valid Yes
No
Total
|
78
31
109
|
71.6
28.4
100.0
|
71.6
28.4
100.0
|
71.6
100.0
|
Table 4.1
Which of the following
do you think can cause diabetes mellitus?
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid
Percent
|
Cumulative
Present
|
Valid Bulk food containing
Carbohydrate
Plenty meat, vegetable
and little water
Beans product and meat
Total
|
56
20
33
109
|
51.4
18.3
30.3
100.0
|
51.4
18.3
30.3
100.0
|
51.4
69.7
100.0
|
Table 4.14
If no to question 14
above 14 above, what is the reason?
Valid Complexity of the diet
Poor satisfaction
Financial constraints
Total
Missing System
Total
|
Frequency
21
14
10
45
64
109
|
Present
19.3
12.3
9.2
41.3
58.7
100.0
|
Valid
Percent
46.7
12.8
22.2
100.0
|
Cumulative
Percent
46.7
77.8
100.0
|
CHARPTER FIVE
5.0 INTRODUCTION
This
part of the study dealt with the discussion of findings concerning the factors
influencing compliance to dietary regimen among out patient diabetic patient in
Ladoke Akintola University Teaching Hospital, Osogbo.
In addition, the summary, conclusion
implication to nursing and recommendation were dealt with in this chapter.
5.1 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
Result showed that about
43 (39.4%) of respondents are with the age range of 50 years and above and that only
11 (10.1%) are with
the age range of (30-39) years also support. This finding support that of www.ncbi.n/m.nih.gov>journalist>Jfamilycommunitymed>v.17(3)
retrieved 01/09/12 which says that out of the sample of 600 diabetic
patients used in the study, the age of diabetic patient ranged from 25 to 81
years, with a mean age 47.68 + 11.94 years.
An analysis of result
revealed that about 87 (79.8%) of the respondents are female and 22 (20.2%) of
the respondents are male. This finding
support that of www.ncbi.n/m.nih.gov>journalist
>Jfamilycommunitymed>v.17(3) retrieved 01/09/12 which stated
that 48.3% of the sample while women formed 51.7% the men to women ratio being
1:11. The level of education among the respondents shows that 26 (23.9%) had
post secondary education and just 10(9.2%) had university education and that 20
(18.3%). This finding support had no
formal education that of www. ncbi.n/m.nih.gov>journalist>Jfamilycommunitymed>v.17(3)
retrieved 01/09/12 that about one-third (34.5%) of
diabetic patients were illiterate and 41.2% were manual workers. The findings collaborated that of the
findings I have seen which show that education is no barrier to diabetes
mellitus.
The
first hypothesis stated that there was no significant relationship between the
level of compliance to dietary regimen and the education status of respondent
from the result of the research study the hypothesis tested revealed that there
was significant relationship between the level of compliance to dietary regimen
and the educational status of respondent.
My findings was not congruent with a report that state that there was no
significant relationship between the various aspects of compliance and the
socio-demographic characteristics, of the patients such as education,
occupation and marital status www.ncbi.n/m.nih.gov>journalist>Jfamilycommunitymed>v.17(3)
retrieved in
01/09/12. The difference in the findings might not
be unconnected with the number of respondents employed in the two researches
and the level of awareness of such respondent.
The second hypothesis
stated that there is no significant relationship between sex and level of
compliance to dietary regiment after analysis it was found that there was no
significant relationship between sex and level of compliance to dietary regimen
findings was not in consonance with a report that state that there was minimal
gender difference with no statistical differences in adherence to different
aspects of the diabetic regimen, although this thus not show or says any
specific level it was just a minimal difference. www.ncbi.n/m.nih.gov>journalist
>Jfamilycommunitymed>v.17(3) retrieved 01/09/12
The third hypothesis
stated that there is no significant relationship between level of compliance to
dietary regimen and the level of family support. After the analysis is was tested that there
is significant relationship between level of compliance to dietary regimen and
the level of family support. This was
supported by a report that said that the reason for non compliance by 27% of
the patient was financial www.ncbi.n/m.nih.
gov>journalist>Jfamilycommunitymed>v.17(3)
The
fourth hypothesis states that there is no significant relationship between
socio-economic status and level of compliance to dietary regimen among
respondents. The Analysis verified that there was significant relationship
between socio-economic status and level of compliance to dietary regimen among
respondents. My findings was supported
by a report that said that the reason for non-compliance by 27% of the patient
financial.
The
fifth hypothesis states that there is no significant difference between the
level of compliance to diets regimen and other treatment modalities. The
analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the level of
compliance to diet regimen and other treatment modalities. The findings showed
that it was not in congruent with a report that said that. Although adherence to medication is one of
the most important aspects of the management of diabetes mellitus, low rates of
adherence have been documented result of the present study revealed that about
57% of patients always took their medication as prescribed and on time. This means that many of them prefers taking
drug than diet because the focus of this research was to finding out level of
compliance to dietary regimen, but the literature review showed that majority
of them preferred taking drug than dietary regimen but the literature review
showed that majority of them preferred taking drug than dietary regimen www.ncbi.n/m.nih.gov>journalist>Jfamilycommunitymed>v.17(3)
considering all these findings and the literature reviewed it will be better
for patient suffering from diabetes to follow wholist approach of management
form of exercise, diet and drug regimen.
5.2 IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE
A
symptomatic the hyperglycemia poses a great threat to the patients, life
because these patients often peal no different. To ensure that these patient
comply to dietary regimen, it is the duties of the nurses to health educate and
give health information on the danger of not taking their diet as prescribed,
as prescribed, as well as prompt testing of their urine and blood for glucose,
similarly, routine testing of urine and blood test for glucose is necessary by
the nurses and laboratory scientists respectively to be able to detect
asymptomatic diabetes mellitus.
Poor
financial status is one of the major factors that militate against compliance.
Nurses should go through social worker to get philanthropist to assist patient
that having financial problem. Similarly Government should also subsidize
health or provide qualitative free medical services to the masses and those
foods available, affordable and assessable to the community at large.
It
is the duties of the nurses to give health information on the importance of
procuring their food items with the limited resource and to place their health
as priority, as a priority, as health is wealth.
Family
support which is another significant factor in compliance among diabetic
patients, should be encourage to play their role and come closer to their
relationships even in ill health. It is the duties of the nurses to enlighten
their relations to be more support to their clients in terms of moral,
psychological, physical and financial as the case may be to compliance to
dietary regimen.
Finally,
the patients time should be judiciously utilized in the hospitals and prompt
attention should be given to the patients in order to motivate them to be
attending future clinic appointments. This role rests on the nurse and the
physicians as well.
Poor
financial status is one of the major factors that militate against compliance.
Effort should be taken by members of the communities to assist the less
privilege that might need financial assistance to procure drugs.
The
nurse encourage should encourage the clients to adhere to there drug and the
importance and benefit of adherence is made known to them.
When
giving health education to client both in the clinic and in the wards, the
health team, i.e nurses, Doctors, and Nutritionist etc. Should ensure that they
use a language that is not to ambigious to understand by the client, and after
any discussion or health talk given to the client they should ask question to
see if effective communication have taken place i.e if the client really
understood the message been passed to them. The nurse should understand that
the client is of different educational status so the nurses should consider the
level of understanding and educational status of the client before choosing the
language that will be used, for effective communication to take place.
Health
education should involve the preparation of all the types of diet that will be
consumed by the client at home because evidence has shown that majority of the
client is either they under cook or over cook the food and by so doing the
nutrients will have gone.
The
nurses should ensure that patient are adequately catered for and use a
multifaceted approach in the treatment of client with diabetes mellitus. The
nurse should make emphaze on the importance of complying to all the treatment
regimen given to them and the nurses should also do a follow up visit to their
given client and families that are involved in their case so that they can be
sure that there client is complying to the treatment regimen/modalities been
prescribed for him or her.
5.3 SUMMARY
This research is a descriptive study
about the factors influencing level of compliance to dietary regimen among out
patient diabetic. In Lautech Teaching Hospital Osogbo.
A purposive sampling methods were used
in recruiting subjects for the study. A total number of 109 respondents were recruited
and the response was 100%. 36 items structured questionnaire was developed. The
research is delimited to diabetic patient attending the out patient clinic of
LAUTECH Teaching Hospital Osogbo Osun State.
Data analyses were subjected to
statistical package for social sciences reviewed through text book and relevant
studies. It was discovered that factors like level of education, economic
status, time spent in preparing those food, attitude of the health personnel
cultural belief etc. were among the factors that influence the level compliance
of diabetic patient to dietary regimen Hypotheses were tested using pearson’s
chi-squar statistical method. The findings were discussed with relevant
comparism and recommendations were also made.
Having carried out this research among
the 109 subjects it was found that diabetes mellitus had highest prevalence in
people between the age of 50 years and above, in female 87 (79.8%) than male.
The study also show that majority of the respondents are have primary education
(30.3%) while 20 (18.3%) have no formal education, 43 (39.4%) were from General
out patient clinic.
The hypothesis also showed that there
was significant relationship between the level of compliance to dietary regimen
and the educational status of respondent.
There was no significant relationship
between sex and level of compliance to dietary regimen.
There was significant relationship
between level of compliance to dietary regimen and the level of family support.
There was significant relationship
between socio-economic status and level of compliance to dietary regimen among
respondents.
There was no significant difference in
the level of compliance to diets regimen and other treatment modalities.
5.4 CONCLUSION
This result has shown that the
treatment of diabetic mellitus should be mult faceted in the sense that no
single approach of management can result in adequate management of the patient.
Therefore drug management/therapy, exercise, and dietary regimen should come
into play in managing patient with diabetes mellitus.
Also in other to enforce compliance to
dietary management economic status, demographic variables and level of
education of patient should be taken into cognizant. If this therapeutic
indices / methods are use whollistically the patient will be relied / the clinical
manifestations of diabetes mellitus will be controlled to the bearest minimum
of it can not be eliminated.
5.5 RECOMMENDATION
In view of the finding of the study,
the researcher therefore recommends the following:
(1) That all efforts should be intesited on the
education of diabetic patient and the society as a whole on the importance of
compliance to dietary regimen.
(2) That
health workers especially the physicians, nurse and nutritionist, social workers
should health educate diabetic patient on the importance and implication /
complication of non - compliance to dietary regimen.
(3) That
foods that consume less time to be prepared and that are readily available
should be prescribed to prevent them from spending much time and energy in
preparing those foods.
(4) That
the government should subsidize or make those foods readily available for the
diabetic patient at a charge prize they will be able to afford.
(5) Patient
on diet should be advice to adhere to the drug regimen and take there
medications as prescribed, on time and always adhered to dietary regimen to
have better glycaemic control compared with others.
(6) There
is need to consider the source of income of client so as to know if they will
be able to comply with the treatment regimen given to them.
(7) The
level of family support of the patient should be consider before setting basis
for there treatment.
(8) The
lack of educational status of client should be considered in other to enforce
compliances.
(9) Gender
variable should not compromise the care to be given to the client management of
diabetes mellitus should be carried out irrespective of sex differences.
I
am encouraging people to carry out there research studies on attitude of
patient towards health care givers.
Finally, this research is recommended
for further studies to increase the body of knowledge in Nursing Profession to
provide solutions to the immediate challenges and to draw acceptable strategies
and modalities to factors that can influence level compliance to dietary
regimen among the diabetic patients.
REFERENCES
Acta Diabetol . 2003 .Dec:
40(4):181.6, Diagnosis of Diabetes mellitus
Ahlgrenss, shuitz JA, massey LK, Hicks
BC, wyshamc, may: 13(4): 819. 32
Development of a preliminary diabetes
dietary satisfaction and outcomes
http:
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed//5129892 retrieved 22/01/2012
Ahmed MS, ReidE & Khardori N
(2008) “Respiratory Infections in diabetes: Reviewing
the risks and challenges” Journal of
Respiratory Disease.
Alemzaden R & wyatt DT. (2007):
Diabetes mellitus in: Kliegman RM, ed. Nelson Text
book of pediatrics (18th
Ed). Sounders Chap 590.
American Diabetes Association (2009):
Jan: 32 standards supply: 313. 61 of medical
care in diabetes care http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pumbed/1512989.
American Diabetes Association, Auto
immune response - Type 1,
American Diabetes Association,
standards of Medical Care in Diabetes (2009).
Diabetes Care, 2009 Jan: 32 Suppl
1313-61.
Bloom and Bloom, (2009) Toohey’s Medicine for Nurses. Longman group
Ltd. UK
16th Edition.
Bond, Hussara Suarstad (2011), factors
which Affect Compliance to Diet in Diabetes
Mellitus.
Brunner L.S. and Suddarth D.S., 2008
Textbook of Medical Surgical Nursing J.P.
LippincoH Company, Ph ladelpia 14th
Edition.
Clinical Diabetes: Improving Patient
Adherence. Article reviewed by Eric lochridge last
updated on: Nov. 15 , 2010 (Clinical
diabetes Journals. org).
Diabetes A journal of the American
Diabetes Association. Vol. 37 No.6. Merrinar A,
2008 A guide to Nursing Management
Mosby Company. Toronto.
Diamateo (2008) factors influencing
compliance to dietary regimen
http://www/c.d.gov/diabetes/pubs
general. hhm 2008.
Funnell MM, Anderson R.M (2011): The problem with Compliance in diabetes
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go
l pubmed / 10 /S 809.
Horwitz. D.L., 2002, Diabetes and
ageing The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
American Society for clinical
Nutritional inc USA Pg. 803-7 Vol-36 No.4.
Jacauerlin Dunbar - Jacob, (2007)
“supplement state of the science Diabetes self
management”
MODELS FOR CHANGING PATIENT BEHAVOIUR AMERICAN
JOURNAL OF NURSING Clinic 1007 topic:
Diabetes and endocrine 107(6) pp 20 - 25
MAYO 2012 Jan 25, clinic book of
Alternative medicine 2nd ed http://www.mayo
clinic.com/DSO1121.
Mealey, BL (2006) “periodontal disease
and diabetes. A two way street” JOURNAL
OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
(1939) 137 suppl.
Merriam, Webster, m – w.com/dictionary
(Dec. 30, 2011) retrieved 30/01/2012.
National Diabetes Fact Sheet http://www.c.d.gov/diabeties/pubs
general.hhhm 2003,
Nursing
(10th ed.) Philadelphia
Lippincott William and Wikkins.
Nathan D.M, Cleary PA, ack Lund JY
(December, 2005).
National Institute of Diabetes
and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. www.
Niddlk.nih.gov. National Institutes of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
Olaogun A.A.E. 2008, The effect of
health education and family support on patients
with diabeties mellitus, AM.S.C.
research thesis.
Olasemo J.B., Balogun M.08, Ajao E.
(2010): The effect of family reinforcement on
compliance of hypertensive Nigerian
with anti-hypertensive therapy Condiologic Tropicate.
Olowu A.A. Lamikara A. (2008):
Compliance and drug use some Nigeria Data.
Journalist Social & Administrative
Pharmacy: Vol 3-No.4 PP157 - 159.
Omotosho A.B.O, Opadijo O.G. &
Araoye M.A. (2004).
Olowu A.A. Lamikara A. (2008):
Compliance and drug use some Nigeria Data.
Journalist Social & Administrative
Pharmacy: Vol 3-No.4 PP157 - 159.
Rother K1 (April 2007), Diabetes treatment
bridging the divide: The New England
Journal of medicine 356(15):1499.501.
doi: 10. 1056/NEJMPO 78030
Rorbert K. su MD (2011) Carbohydrate
causes Diabetes Mellitus http://www.
Carbohydrate can kill. Com/3143/
retrieved 20/02/2012.
Smith T., (2012) 500mg once a day and
anobiotic compliance. Rox 1 thromycin in
clinical practice iii A literature on
Roxthromycin.
Smith, (2012), Effect of Different
fibre on glucose and lipid levels in Diabetic
Subjects. Acta Med. Scand. Suppl
671:87-90.
meltzer S. & Bare. B (2004)
Brunner and Suddarth’s Text book of Medical Surgical
WaiCT, Wong M,Ngs, cheoka, Tan MH,
chuaw MakB, Aung Mo, lisns G, Aliment
Pharmacol
Ther (2005) may fact on which affect compliance to diet. May 2005
15:21(10):1255.62.
Wilkinson, (2008) factors influencing
compliance to Diet in diabetes
http.//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub med/14
740278 retrieved 23/01/2012.
Vermeire (2011), non compliance to
diet regimen in diabetes
http.//www.c.d.gov/diabetes/pubs
general .hhhm.
Table 4.24 shows that 28
(25.7%) of the respondents said they would note the spacing of their previous
meal if their urine contain too much sugar, 69 (63.3%) said they would reduce
the quality of all food to be taken, while 12 (11.0%) said they don’t know.
Section
c: Family support
Table 4.25 shows that 36 (33.0%) of
the respondents said their family member accompanied them to the clinic, while
73 (67.0%) said not they are not.
Table 4.26 shows that 79 (72.5%) of
the respondents said they accept them and the type of treatment they are
passing through, while 30 (27.5%) said no they are not.
Table 4.27 shows that 87 (79.8%) of
the respondents said they encourage them in anyway to ensure that they take
their drugs at home and carry out follow up care, while 22 (20.2%) said no they
are not.
Table 4.28 shows that 79 (72.5%) of
the respondents said they are encourage to discuss their health problem at
home, while 30 (27.5%) said no they are not.
Table 4.29 shows that 77 (70.6%) of
the respondents said their family member do assist them in the purchase of
drugs or reinforce them financially in terms of their management, while 32
(29.4%) said no they are not.
Appendix
Section
B: Knowledge on diabetes mellitus and perception of dietary regimen.
Table 4.11:
Do
you think diabetes can be treated?
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
Valid Yes
|
87
|
79.8
|
79.8
|
79.8
|
No
|
22
|
20.2
|
20.2
|
100.0
|
Total
|
109
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
Table
4.12
Do you think is curable?
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid
Percent
|
Cumulative
Percent
|
Valid Yes
No
Total
|
78
31
109
|
71.6
28.4
100.0
|
71.6
28.4
100.0
|
71.6
100.0
|
Table 4.1
Which of the following
do you think can cause diabetes mellitus?
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid
Percent
|
Cumulative
Present
|
Valid Bulk food containing
Carbohydrate
Plenty meat, vegetable
and little water
Beans product and meat
Total
|
56
20
33
109
|
51.4
18.3
30.3
100.0
|
51.4
18.3
30.3
100.0
|
51.4
69.7
100.0
|
Table 4.14
If no to question 14
above 14 above, what is the reason?
Valid Complexity of the diet
Poor satisfaction
Financial constraints
Total
Missing System
Total
|
Frequency
21
14
10
45
64
109
|
Present
19.3
12.3
9.2
41.3
58.7
100.0
|
Valid
Percent
46.7
12.8
22.2
100.0
|
Cumulative
Percent
46.7
77.8
100.0
|
QUESTIONNAIRE
Factors Influencing non-compliance to dietary
regimen among out patient.
Department
of Nursing,
College of Health Sciences,
LAUTECH,
Osogbo,
Osun State.
Dear Respondent,
This
questionnaire is distributed for a scientific study on the perception of
diabetic patients toward dietary regimen.
I sincerely plead for your responses and all information given will be
kept with utmost confidentiality.
Thanks
for your willingness to participate.
Folaranmi
Basirat Temitope
400
Level
Matric
No. 082061
Section A Demographic Data
1. Age (a) 20-29
(b) 30-39 (c)
40-49
(d) 50years and above
2. Sex (a) Male (b) Female
3. Level of education (a) No
formal education (b) Primary
education
(c) Secondary Education (d) post secondary education
(e) University education
4. Occupational status (a) Civil Servant (b) Farming
(c) Self employed (d) Schooling (e) Pensioner
5. Marital Status (a) Single (b) Married
(c) Divorced (d) widowed
6. Religion (a) Christianity (b) Islamic (c) Traditional Others
specify ……………………
7. Ward (a) male Medical ward (b) female medical ward
(c) General out patient clinic
Section B Knowledge on D.M. and Perception of dietary regimen
8. What
is diabetes mellitus?
(a) It is an elevation of the blood glucose
level
(b) It is an elevation of blood level
(c) It is an elevation of blood plasma level
9. Do you think diabetes
mellitus can be treated? Yes No
10. If it
can be treated through which means can it be treated?
………………………………………………………
11. Do you think is
correctable? Yes No
12. Which of the means of
treatment are you using?
(a) Drugs only (b) Drugs and diet
(c) Herbal preparation (d) Insulin
13. Which of the following do
you think can cause diabetes mellitus
(a) Bulk food containing carbohydrate (b)
plenty meat, vegetable and little water (c) Beans product and meat
14. Have you been coping with dietary regimen
given to you in the hospital?
(a) Yes (b) No
15. If No to question 14 above,
what is the reason?
(a) complexity of the
diet (b) poor satisfaction
(c) Financial constraints (d) Other specify …………...
16. What was your weight before the onset of
the illness?
17. What was your weight after the onset of the
illness?
18. How often do you check your
weight? (a) 6 months interval
(b) 3 months interval (c) monthly (d)
weekly
19. Diabetic diet are expensive
(a) Yes (b) No
20. Diabetic diet are complex (a) Yes (b) No
21. Diabetic diet are time
consuming (a) Yes (b) No
22. Diabetic diet causes
diarrhea (a) Yes (b) No
23. Diabetic diet causes
constipation (a) Yes (b) No
24. Management of Diabetes
mellitus is a daily discipline
(a) Yes (b) No
25. Diabetic
diet are not easily accessible
(a) Yes (b) No
26. Diet of a diabetic patient
are not palatable (a) Yes (b) No
27. If you feel dizzy what
should you do? (a) Eat some food or four
cubes of sugar (b) Go to sleep (c) Do little
exercise
(d) I don’t know
28. If you want to do exercise
you must have what in your pocket or bag
(a) four cubes of sugar (b)
Bulky foods (d)
I don’t know
29. Which food items should be
increased? (a) Yam, Garri, Rise
(b) Vegetable and Beans (c) I don’t know
30. If you test urine and there is too much
sugar, what would you do to your food intake? (a)
Note the spacing of the previous meal
(b) Reduce the quantity of all food to be taken
(c) I don’t know
SECTION 3 (Family Support)
For each of the following questions, please tick
“Yes” If it is generally tune to you and “No” if it is not
Items Yes No
31. Is any
of your family members staying with you?
32. Have
any of them accompanied you to the clinic?
33. Do
they accept you and the type of treatment you
Are
passing through?
34. Do
they encourage you in a ways to ensure that you
Take
your drugs at home and carry out follow
Up
cares
35. Are
you encouraged to discuss your health problem
at
home?
36. Does
anyone of them assist in the purchase of drugs
for
you or reinforces you financially in terms of your
management?
Comments
Post a Comment